Social Desirability and Political Sensitivity: Interviewer Gender Effects on Men in Five Arab Countries

Abstract Survey research is growing, yet research on data quality continues to rely mainly on samples from the United States and Europe. To contribute, we test for interviewer gender effects on men in the Middle East and North Africa, where studies of data quality are particularly scarce. Theoretically, we focus on the implications of less gender-egalitarian contexts for response tendencies. For questions about politics and government, we find that men respondents tend to provide more socially desirable responses to men interviewers, offering “safer” and more pro-regime answers. Yet, for questions that touch on their own social status, such as self-reported income and religiosity, they appear to offer more socially desirable responses to women interviewers. The findings strengthen the case for comparative investigations of data quality, and highlight the value of contextual knowledge about politics and gender relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Desirability and Political Sensitivity: Interviewer Gender Effects on Men in Five Arab Countries

Calvert W. Jones, Jocelyn Sage Mitchell
1 citations
Public Opinion Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

Social Desirability and Political Sensitivity: Interviewer Gender Effects on Men in Five Arab Countries

Calvert W. Jones, Jocelyn Sage Mitchell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Survey research is growing, yet research on data quality continues to rely mainly on samples from the United States and Europe. To contribute, we test for interviewer gender effects on men in the Middle East and North Africa, where studies of data quality are particularly scarce. Theoretically, we focus on the implications of less gender-egalitarian contexts for response tendencies. For questions about politics and government, we find that men respondents tend to provide more socially desirable responses to men interviewers, offering “safer” and more pro-regime answers. Yet, for questions that touch on their own social status, such as self-reported income and religiosity, they appear to offer more socially desirable responses to women interviewers. The findings strengthen the case for comparative investigations of data quality, and highlight the value of contextual knowledge about politics and gender relations.

Public Opinion QuarterlyVol. 89(4)
Northwestern University in Qatar (QA), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Qatar National Research Fund
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.