Environmental and biogeochemical drivers of CH4 and N2O flux variability in treatment wetlands

Methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from wetlands vary spatially, influencing total greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. Accurately quantifying these variations is essential for refining CH 4 and N 2 O budgets and developing effective mitigation strategies. This study applies the closed chamber method to assess CH 4 and N 2 O flux variability over five years in treatment wetlands designed to reduce agricultural diffuse pollution, focusing on key environmental and biogeochemical drivers at 12 sampling points. Hotspots, identified as sampling points where high-emission events (hot moments) contributed disproportionately, exceeding 8.33 % of total emissions, were determined from the mean plus two-standard-deviation threshold. Median (interquartile range) CH 4 emissions were 115.86 (16.1–1191.31) μg CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 in hotspots and 109.15 (27.49–722.62) μg CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 in non-hotspots. Similarly, median N 2 O emissions were 75.33 (29.71–187.85) μg N 2 O-N m −2 h −1 in hotspots, compared to 15.41 (5.87–38.01) μg N 2 O-N m −2 h −1 in non-hotspots. Statistical analysis identified water level as the key predictor of N 2 O flux differences, with lower water levels driving higher emissions. CH 4 fluxes were influenced by multiple interacting factors, including dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, conductivity, and water level, with the highest emissions under more reducing conditions. Seasonal trends revealed higher CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes during the growing season, coinciding with higher temperatures and reduced flow rates. Our findings highlight the critical role of water level regulation, flow rate control, and oxygenation strategies in reducing CH 4 and N 2 O emissions. These insights contribute to optimizing wetland design and management for water treatment efficiency and climate mitigation. • CH 4 and N 2 O flux variations differ across sampling points in treatment wetlands. • CH 4 flux variations were driven by interacting factors, including dissolved oxygen. • CH 4 increased with sediment buildup while N 2 O remained relatively stable over time. • While temperature affects flux magnitude, low water levels drive high N 2 O emissions. • Water level control and oxygenation can help lower CH 4 and N 2 O emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107705
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and biogeochemical drivers of CH4 and N2O flux variability in treatment wetlands

Isaac Okiti, Mihkel Pindus, Kuno Kasak, Gideon Efakwu
4 citations
Ecological Engineering
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
6.87
article

Environmental and biogeochemical drivers of CH4 and N2O flux variability in treatment wetlands

Isaac Okiti, Mihkel Pindus, Kuno Kasak, Gideon Efakwu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from wetlands vary spatially, influencing total greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. Accurately quantifying these variations is essential for refining CH 4 and N 2 O budgets and developing effective mitigation strategies. This study applies the closed chamber method to assess CH 4 and N 2 O flux variability over five years in treatment wetlands designed to reduce agricultural diffuse pollution, focusing on key environmental and biogeochemical drivers at 12 sampling points. Hotspots, identified as sampling points where high-emission events (hot moments) contributed disproportionately, exceeding 8.33 % of total emissions, were determined from the mean plus two-standard-deviation threshold. Median (interquartile range) CH 4 emissions were 115.86 (16.1–1191.31) μg CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 in hotspots and 109.15 (27.49–722.62) μg CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 in non-hotspots. Similarly, median N 2 O emissions were 75.33 (29.71–187.85) μg N 2 O-N m −2 h −1 in hotspots, compared to 15.41 (5.87–38.01) μg N 2 O-N m −2 h −1 in non-hotspots. Statistical analysis identified water level as the key predictor of N 2 O flux differences, with lower water levels driving higher emissions. CH 4 fluxes were influenced by multiple interacting factors, including dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, conductivity, and water level, with the highest emissions under more reducing conditions. Seasonal trends revealed higher CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes during the growing season, coinciding with higher temperatures and reduced flow rates. Our findings highlight the critical role of water level regulation, flow rate control, and oxygenation strategies in reducing CH 4 and N 2 O emissions. These insights contribute to optimizing wetland design and management for water treatment efficiency and climate mitigation. • CH 4 and N 2 O flux variations differ across sampling points in treatment wetlands. • CH 4 flux variations were driven by interacting factors, including dissolved oxygen. • CH 4 increased with sediment buildup while N 2 O remained relatively stable over time. • While temperature affects flux magnitude, low water levels drive high N 2 O emissions. • Water level control and oxygenation can help lower CH 4 and N 2 O emissions.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 219
University of Tartu (EE), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.