Self- versus caregiver-reported apathy across neurological disorders
Apathy is a prevalent and persistent neuropsychiatric syndrome across many neurological disorders, significantly impacting both patients and caregivers. We systematically quantified discrepancies between self- and caregiver-reported apathy in 335 patients with a variety of diagnoses, such as frontotemporal dementia (behavioural variant and semantic dementia subtypes), Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease dementia, mild cognitive impairment, small vessel cerebrovascular disease, subjective cognitive decline and autoimmune encephalitis. Using the Apathy Motivation Index (AMI) and its analogous caregiver version (AMI-CG), we found that caregiver-reported apathy consistently exceeded self-reported levels across all conditions. Moreover, self-reported apathy accounted for only 14.1% of the variance in caregiver ratings. This apathy reporting discrepancy was most pronounced in conditions associated with impaired insight, such as behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and was significantly correlated with cognitive impairment. Deficits in memory and fluency explained an additional 11.2% of the variance in caregiver-reported apathy. Specifically, executive function deficits (e.g. indexed by fluency) and memory impairments may contribute to behavioural inertia or recall of it. These findings highlight the need to integrate patient and caregiver perspectives in apathy assessments, especially for conditions with prominent cognitive impairment. To improve diagnostic accuracy and deepen our understanding of apathy across neurological disorders, we highlight the need for adapted apathy assessment strategies that account for cognitive impairment particularly in individuals with insight or memory deficits. Understanding the cognitive mechanisms underpinning discordant apathy reporting in dementia might help inform targeted clinical interventions and reduce caregiver burden.
Authors
- Sijia Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-0702)
- Sanjay Manohar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-4349)
- James B. Rowe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-8679)
- Masud Husain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-9255)
- Matthew A Rouse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-4301)
- Sarosh R. Irani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-9748)
- Matthew A. Lambon Ralph (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-2488)
- Sian Thompson
- Sofia Toniolo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-4995)
- M. John Broulidakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9314-9100)
- Verena Klar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-2485)
- Peter Garrard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-9718)
- Akke Ganse‐Dumrath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-8117)
- Anna Scholcz
Institutions
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Jacksonville College (US)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Brain Communications
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf235
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.45
Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Medical Research Council Canada
- Medical Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre