Workplace Bullshitting: A Multidimensional Analysis of Motives

The present research addresses the question: why do employees engage in bullshitting at work? We examined this research question over three phases of multidimensional scaling (MDS). In the first (elicitation) phase ( n = 222), we uncovered 36 unique motives for workplace bullshitting. Phase 2 analyses ( n = 610) yielded a two-dimensional MDS configuration of these 36 motives. Phase 3 interpretation ( n = 118) produced a four-quadrant typology of motives definable by the intersection of two motivation theories: striving goals and regulatory focus . Thus, employees engage in workplace bullshitting for the purposes of getting ahead (status-promotion), getting away (status-prevention), getting along (communion-promotion), and getting around (communion-prevention). The typology meets fundamental theory-building criteria and underpins a nomological network of workplace bullshitting that advances understanding of why employees engage in bullshitting and how the use of bullshitting may affect them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251348757
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workplace Bullshitting: A Multidimensional Analysis of Motives

Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Fan Xuan Chen, Kohyar Kiazad
6 citations
Group & Organization Management
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
14.63
article

Workplace Bullshitting: A Multidimensional Analysis of Motives

Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Fan Xuan Chen, Kohyar Kiazad
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The present research addresses the question: why do employees engage in bullshitting at work? We examined this research question over three phases of multidimensional scaling (MDS). In the first (elicitation) phase ( n = 222), we uncovered 36 unique motives for workplace bullshitting. Phase 2 analyses ( n = 610) yielded a two-dimensional MDS configuration of these 36 motives. Phase 3 interpretation ( n = 118) produced a four-quadrant typology of motives definable by the intersection of two motivation theories: striving goals and regulatory focus . Thus, employees engage in workplace bullshitting for the purposes of getting ahead (status-promotion), getting away (status-prevention), getting along (communion-promotion), and getting around (communion-prevention). The typology meets fundamental theory-building criteria and underpins a nomological network of workplace bullshitting that advances understanding of why employees engage in bullshitting and how the use of bullshitting may affect them.

Group & Organization Management
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), University of Bath (GB), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.