Structuring Arrays with Algebraic Shapes

Static type systems help prevent errors, improve abstractions, and enable optimisations. There is a whole spectrum of type systems for general-purpose languages, covering a wide range of safety guarantees and expressivity. Despite this, type systems for array programming languages are usually at one of two extremes. In the majority of cases they are nearly untyped, only distinguishing array types by element type or number of dimensions. Otherwise, they tend to reach for powerful dependent types. However, it is difficult to extend existing solutions with a dependent type system, and some problems become undecidable when we do so. Practical array programming – in data science, machine learning and the like – sticks to the bliss of dynamic typing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3736112.3736141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cellular Automata and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structuring Arrays with Algebraic Shapes

Alan Mycroft, Dominic Orchard, Jakub Bachurski
1 citations
Cellular Automata and Applications
1.50
article

Structuring Arrays with Algebraic Shapes

Alan Mycroft, Dominic Orchard, Jakub Bachurski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Static type systems help prevent errors, improve abstractions, and enable optimisations. There is a whole spectrum of type systems for general-purpose languages, covering a wide range of safety guarantees and expressivity. Despite this, type systems for array programming languages are usually at one of two extremes. In the majority of cases they are nearly untyped, only distinguishing array types by element type or number of dimensions. Otherwise, they tend to reach for powerful dependent types. However, it is difficult to extend existing solutions with a dependent type system, and some problems become undecidable when we do so. Practical array programming – in data science, machine learning and the like – sticks to the bliss of dynamic typing.

University of Kent (GB), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cellular Automata and Applications
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.