The health-related impact of disruptions in cancer care and the Waiting Time Paradox

Healthcare system disruptions, such as that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, can lead to delays in, or lag time to, cancer diagnosis and treatment. In order to quantify the negative impact of disruptions such as this on the health of populations, a better grasp on biases that might affect estimation of effects of diagnosis or treatment delays on clinical outcomes is needed. Here, we discuss some of the methodological difficulties in these analyses, including those posed by what has been referred to as the Waiting Time Paradox. In doing so, we define the effect of lag time using potential outcomes, describe evidence for the Waiting Time Paradox, and present directed acyclic graphs to characterize different contexts when it might occur. Although our discussion is motivated by disruptions in cancer care, accurate quantification of lag time's effect would be valuable for the study of other medical conditions and different types of medical service inefficiencies, as well as in settings where policy changes to minimize waiting time are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf128
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The health-related impact of disruptions in cancer care and the Waiting Time Paradox

Bronner P. Gonçalves, Mariam El‐Zein, Parker Tope, Eduardo Luis Franco
3 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
9.39
article

The health-related impact of disruptions in cancer care and the Waiting Time Paradox

Bronner P. Gonçalves, Mariam El‐Zein, Parker Tope, Eduardo Luis Franco
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Healthcare system disruptions, such as that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, can lead to delays in, or lag time to, cancer diagnosis and treatment. In order to quantify the negative impact of disruptions such as this on the health of populations, a better grasp on biases that might affect estimation of effects of diagnosis or treatment delays on clinical outcomes is needed. Here, we discuss some of the methodological difficulties in these analyses, including those posed by what has been referred to as the Waiting Time Paradox. In doing so, we define the effect of lag time using potential outcomes, describe evidence for the Waiting Time Paradox, and present directed acyclic graphs to characterize different contexts when it might occur. Although our discussion is motivated by disruptions in cancer care, accurate quantification of lag time's effect would be valuable for the study of other medical conditions and different types of medical service inefficiencies, as well as in settings where policy changes to minimize waiting time are considered.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(10)
University of Surrey (GB), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.