Power in plurality voting games

Abstract Simple games in partition function form are used to model voting situations where a coalition being winning or losing might depend on the way players outside that coalition organize themselves. Such a game is called a plurality voting game if in every partition there is at least one winning coalition. In the present paper, we introduce an equal impact power index for this class of voting games and provide an axiomatic characterization. This power index is based on equal weight for every partition, equal weight for every winning coalition in a partition, and equal weight for each player in a winning coalition. Since some of the axioms we develop are conditioned on the power impact of losing coalitions becoming winning in a partition, our characterization heavily depends on a new result showing the existence of such elementary transitions between plurality voting games in terms of single embedded winning coalitions. The axioms restrict then the impact of such elementary transitions on the power of different types of players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Decision
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-025-10053-z
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power in plurality voting games

Dinko Dimitrov, René van den Brink, Agnieszka Rusinowska
Theory and Decision
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Power in plurality voting games

Dinko Dimitrov, René van den Brink, Agnieszka Rusinowska
article en

Abstract

Abstract Simple games in partition function form are used to model voting situations where a coalition being winning or losing might depend on the way players outside that coalition organize themselves. Such a game is called a plurality voting game if in every partition there is at least one winning coalition. In the present paper, we introduce an equal impact power index for this class of voting games and provide an axiomatic characterization. This power index is based on equal weight for every partition, equal weight for every winning coalition in a partition, and equal weight for each player in a winning coalition. Since some of the axioms we develop are conditioned on the power impact of losing coalitions becoming winning in a partition, our characterization heavily depends on a new result showing the existence of such elementary transitions between plurality voting games in terms of single embedded winning coalitions. The axioms restrict then the impact of such elementary transitions on the power of different types of players.

Theory and DecisionVol. 99(1-2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Tinbergen Institute (NL), Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR), Saarland University (DE)
Universität des Saarlandes
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Power in plurality voting games — Dinko Dimitrov, René van den Brink, et al. · Theory and Decision (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS