Infrastructure Sabotage as Future‐Making: The Material and Immaterial Power of Constructive Destruction

Abstract We propose that a critical examination of infrastructure sabotage should consider its material and immaterial dimension, and its constructive and destructive effects. Combining these two antagonisms, we suggest a matrix of four quadrants that describes (1) deconstructive material effects , (2) constructive material effects , (3) destructive immaterial effects , and (4) constructive immaterial effects of infrastructure sabotage. Through the case study of the Game Galana Dam—a project intended to promote agricultural development in a semi‐arid area of Kenya—we explore how marginalised communities perceive such infrastructures as threats to their futures. Through sabotage, they do not only mean to destroy the dam, but also to benefit from it materially. Furthermore, the sabotage is intended to highlight the injustices to which they feel exposed, and demonstrate their power. The sabotage‐matrix suggested here helps to reveal otherwise hidden dimensions of infrastructure sabotage, contributing to broader debates about resistance to infrastructure in human geography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70042
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrastructure Sabotage as Future‐Making: The Material and Immaterial Power of Constructive Destruction

Theo Aalders, Eric Kioko
5 citations
Antipode
Water Governance and Infrastructure
42.61
article

Infrastructure Sabotage as Future‐Making: The Material and Immaterial Power of Constructive Destruction

Theo Aalders, Eric Kioko
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract We propose that a critical examination of infrastructure sabotage should consider its material and immaterial dimension, and its constructive and destructive effects. Combining these two antagonisms, we suggest a matrix of four quadrants that describes (1) deconstructive material effects , (2) constructive material effects , (3) destructive immaterial effects , and (4) constructive immaterial effects of infrastructure sabotage. Through the case study of the Game Galana Dam—a project intended to promote agricultural development in a semi‐arid area of Kenya—we explore how marginalised communities perceive such infrastructures as threats to their futures. Through sabotage, they do not only mean to destroy the dam, but also to benefit from it materially. Furthermore, the sabotage is intended to highlight the injustices to which they feel exposed, and demonstrate their power. The sabotage‐matrix suggested here helps to reveal otherwise hidden dimensions of infrastructure sabotage, contributing to broader debates about resistance to infrastructure in human geography.

AntipodeVol. 57(5)
University of Bonn (DE), Kenyatta University (KE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Lunds Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
42.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.