A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.

Assessing how accurately a cohort extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) represents the intended target population, or cohort fitness, is critical but often overlooked in secondary EHR data use. This scoping review aimed to (1) identify guidelines for assessing cohort fitness and (2) determine their thoroughness by examining whether they offer sufficient detail and computable methods for researchers. This scoping review follows the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and is refined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklists. Searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus. From 1,904 results, 30 articles and 2 additional references were reviewed. Nine articles (28.13%) include a framework for evaluating cohort fitness but only 5 (15.63%) contain sufficient details and quantitative methodologies. Overall, a more comprehensive guideline that provides best practices for measuring the cohort fitness is still needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.

Wei Pan, Sripriya Rajamani, Ratchada Jantraporn, Steve Johnson et al.
1 links
PubMed
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.

Wei Pan, Sripriya Rajamani, Ratchada Jantraporn, Steve Johnson, Elizabeth Weinfurter, György Simon, Nattanit Songthangtham
article en

Abstract

Assessing how accurately a cohort extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) represents the intended target population, or cohort fitness, is critical but often overlooked in secondary EHR data use. This scoping review aimed to (1) identify guidelines for assessing cohort fitness and (2) determine their thoroughness by examining whether they offer sufficient detail and computable methods for researchers. This scoping review follows the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and is refined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklists. Searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus. From 1,904 results, 30 articles and 2 additional references were reviewed. Nine articles (28.13%) include a framework for evaluating cohort fitness but only 5 (15.63%) contain sufficient details and quantitative methodologies. Overall, a more comprehensive guideline that provides best practices for measuring the cohort fitness is still needed.

PubMedVol. 2025
University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.