Evaluating the difficulty of setting pocket gopher traps: a subjective and objective assessment of 5 trap designs evaluated with subjective and objective methods

Abstract Trapping is an important method for controlling pocket gophers. However, the difficulty of setting certain pocket gopher traps presents a barrier to their use. This study evaluates 5 common pocket gopher traps with differing operational mechanisms to determine which design(s) are easiest for applicators to set, using both objective and subjective criteria. The findings aim to assist individuals in selecting traps that match their trap-setting capabilities. Additionally, we describe a tool designed to assist individuals in setting more challenging traps in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaf023
Primary Topic
Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the difficulty of setting pocket gopher traps: a subjective and objective assessment of 5 trap designs evaluated with subjective and objective methods

Jared T. Beaver, Stephen M. Vantassel, Kevin W. Cook, Dillon Silvernale
1 links
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
article

Evaluating the difficulty of setting pocket gopher traps: a subjective and objective assessment of 5 trap designs evaluated with subjective and objective methods

Jared T. Beaver, Stephen M. Vantassel, Kevin W. Cook, Dillon Silvernale
article en

Abstract

Abstract Trapping is an important method for controlling pocket gophers. However, the difficulty of setting certain pocket gopher traps presents a barrier to their use. This study evaluates 5 common pocket gopher traps with differing operational mechanisms to determine which design(s) are easiest for applicators to set, using both objective and subjective criteria. The findings aim to assist individuals in selecting traps that match their trap-setting capabilities. Additionally, we describe a tool designed to assist individuals in setting more challenging traps in the field.

Journal of Integrated Pest ManagementVol. 16(1)
Montana State University (US), Montana Department of Agriculture (US)
Montana State University, Montana Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the difficulty of setting pocket gopher traps: a subjective and objective assessment of 5 trap designs evaluated with subjective and objective methods — Jared T. Beaver, Stephen M. Vantassel, et al. · Journal of Integrated Pest Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS