Iraqi Kurdistan’s Referendum at 2017: Motives – Implications

In September 2017, Iraq’s Kurdish community held a vote on seceding from the Iraqi state. It was decided to hold the referendum after Kurdish lawmakers admitted that they had more than one reason for pushing for it. The referendum’s implementation and achievement of its intended goals were hampered by numerous obstacles at the local, regional, and international levels. Despite a substantial majority of participants voting in favor of separation from Iraq, the consequences for Iraq’s stability and the security of the Kurdistan Region, as well as the reactions that would follow, would not have been favorable to the Kurdish people. Alternatively, it set this project back many years, by causing the Kurdistan Region to incur significant losses in its relationship with the Iraqi state, its regional neighbors, and international parties. This referendum also contributed to the exacerbation of the region’s political and economic crises. Accordingly, the Kurdistan Regional Government attempted to change its previous strategy with both the federal government in Baghdad and a number of neighboring countries to address and contain the crisis.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Political and Security Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31271/10120
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iraqi Kurdistan’s Referendum at 2017: Motives – Implications

Journal for Political and Security Studies
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

Iraqi Kurdistan’s Referendum at 2017: Motives – Implications

article en

Abstract

In September 2017, Iraq’s Kurdish community held a vote on seceding from the Iraqi state. It was decided to hold the referendum after Kurdish lawmakers admitted that they had more than one reason for pushing for it. The referendum’s implementation and achievement of its intended goals were hampered by numerous obstacles at the local, regional, and international levels. Despite a substantial majority of participants voting in favor of separation from Iraq, the consequences for Iraq’s stability and the security of the Kurdistan Region, as well as the reactions that would follow, would not have been favorable to the Kurdish people. Alternatively, it set this project back many years, by causing the Kurdistan Region to incur significant losses in its relationship with the Iraqi state, its regional neighbors, and international parties. This referendum also contributed to the exacerbation of the region’s political and economic crises. Accordingly, the Kurdistan Regional Government attempted to change its previous strategy with both the federal government in Baghdad and a number of neighboring countries to address and contain the crisis.

Journal for Political and Security StudiesVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s Referendum at 2017: Motives – Implications · Journal for Political and Security Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS