Analyzing alternative academic assessments (AAAs) in universities with cheat-proofing behaviors and instructor-formulated mechanics in an AI-dependent setting

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly disrupted the education system, reshaping how knowledge is accessed, delivered, and assessed. Tools such as ChatGPT and other generative AI models have revolutionized academic practices by offering instantaneous information retrieval, personalized tutoring, automated grading, and content creation. This paper investigated the strategies employed by higher education instructors in evaluating student outputs in light of the challenges posed by AI to learners’ critical thinking abilities and cognitive development. A total of 22 instructors from higher education institutions in Central Visayas, Philippines, were purposively selected to participate in one-on-one interviews. The findings revealed a profound shift in the academic assessment landscape of higher education due to the use of AI technologies. Instructors expressed heightened concern over academic dishonesty, intellectual disengagement, and over-reliance on AI, fearing that students were bypassing essential cognitive processes and undermining the authenticity of their academic outputs. These concerns prompted instructors to adopt Alternative Assessment Approaches (AAAs) designed to reinforce academic integrity and critical thinking. Key strategies included real-world reflective tasks that demand contextualized knowledge application, scaffolded assignments that track the learning process, timed assessments to limit AI interference, and the use of reflective journals to build metacognitive awareness. The pervasive use of AI challenges traditional assessment methods, prompting educators to adopt more process-oriented, reflective, and context-based strategies that prioritize critical thinking and authentic engagement. Policy reforms may be necessary to guide ethical AI use and ensure assessments continue to serve as valid measures of student understanding and intellectual growth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3265
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing alternative academic assessments (AAAs) in universities with cheat-proofing behaviors and instructor-formulated mechanics in an AI-dependent setting

Anesito L. Cutillas, Fritz D. Bacalso, Enrique E. Balili, Mariel H. Remo et al.
2 citations
Environment and Social Psychology
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
article

Analyzing alternative academic assessments (AAAs) in universities with cheat-proofing behaviors and instructor-formulated mechanics in an AI-dependent setting

Anesito L. Cutillas, Fritz D. Bacalso, Enrique E. Balili, Mariel H. Remo, Estrella S. Quindala, Evangeline C. Rellin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly disrupted the education system, reshaping how knowledge is accessed, delivered, and assessed. Tools such as ChatGPT and other generative AI models have revolutionized academic practices by offering instantaneous information retrieval, personalized tutoring, automated grading, and content creation. This paper investigated the strategies employed by higher education instructors in evaluating student outputs in light of the challenges posed by AI to learners’ critical thinking abilities and cognitive development. A total of 22 instructors from higher education institutions in Central Visayas, Philippines, were purposively selected to participate in one-on-one interviews. The findings revealed a profound shift in the academic assessment landscape of higher education due to the use of AI technologies. Instructors expressed heightened concern over academic dishonesty, intellectual disengagement, and over-reliance on AI, fearing that students were bypassing essential cognitive processes and undermining the authenticity of their academic outputs. These concerns prompted instructors to adopt Alternative Assessment Approaches (AAAs) designed to reinforce academic integrity and critical thinking. Key strategies included real-world reflective tasks that demand contextualized knowledge application, scaffolded assignments that track the learning process, timed assessments to limit AI interference, and the use of reflective journals to build metacognitive awareness. The pervasive use of AI challenges traditional assessment methods, prompting educators to adopt more process-oriented, reflective, and context-based strategies that prioritize critical thinking and authentic engagement. Policy reforms may be necessary to guide ethical AI use and ensure assessments continue to serve as valid measures of student understanding and intellectual growth.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing alternative academic assessments (AAAs) in universities with cheat-proofing behaviors and instructor-formulated mechanics in an AI-dependent setting — Anesito L. Cutillas, Fritz D. Bacalso, et al. · Environment and Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS