Evaluation of liver fibrosis using diffusion-weighted virtual magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastography

VMRE demonstrates insufficient diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis staging in both HBV and non-HBV populations, with only limited ability to distinguish extreme fibrosis stages (F0 vs. F4) in HBV patients. While showing excellent technical reproducibility (ICC = 0.972), its poor discriminative performance (AUC 0.45-0.76 across groups) and inability to differentiate intermediate stages preclude clinical utility. In contrast, USE achieved consistently superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.86-0.95) with practical threshold values, supporting its preference over VMRE especially in centers lacking access to standard MRE. Further VMRE development requires technical optimization and larger validation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05043-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of liver fibrosis using diffusion-weighted virtual magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastography

Mustafa Arda Onar, Bilge Can Meydan, Aydın Deveci, Mehmet Selim Nural
3 citations
Abdominal Radiology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
4.06
article

Evaluation of liver fibrosis using diffusion-weighted virtual magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastography

Mustafa Arda Onar, Bilge Can Meydan, Aydın Deveci, Mehmet Selim Nural
article en
3 citations

Abstract

VMRE demonstrates insufficient diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis staging in both HBV and non-HBV populations, with only limited ability to distinguish extreme fibrosis stages (F0 vs. F4) in HBV patients. While showing excellent technical reproducibility (ICC = 0.972), its poor discriminative performance (AUC 0.45-0.76 across groups) and inability to differentiate intermediate stages preclude clinical utility. In contrast, USE achieved consistently superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.86-0.95) with practical threshold values, supporting its preference over VMRE especially in centers lacking access to standard MRE. Further VMRE development requires technical optimization and larger validation studies.

Abdominal RadiologyVol. 51(1)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Bartin University (TR), State Hospital (GB), Sivas State Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
4.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.