Guardianship Reporting System: A Comparative Legal Perspective

The aging of the population and the miniaturization of the family have intensified the need for guardianship, but the current guardianship supervision relies on ex post facto remedies, poses a vacuum of supervision and the risk of alienation of guardianship, and is unable to adapt to changes in the mental status of the ward. The U.S. Multi-Review Network and the innovative reporting model of the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau and the Shanghai Jiading Court provide realistic models for system construction. China should introduce the concept of assisted decision-making, clarify the reporting responsibilities of guardians, build a pluralistic and co-governance review system centered on civil affairs departments and a guardianship information sharing mechanism, form a professional training and assessment mechanism for guardians, and promote the transformation of the guardianship supervision system from "passive relief" to "active prevention". Transformation of the guardianship supervision system from "passive relief" to "active prevention".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/3j2wz827
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guardianship Reporting System: A Comparative Legal Perspective

Dongsheng Han
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Legal principles and applications
article

Guardianship Reporting System: A Comparative Legal Perspective

Dongsheng Han
article en

Abstract

The aging of the population and the miniaturization of the family have intensified the need for guardianship, but the current guardianship supervision relies on ex post facto remedies, poses a vacuum of supervision and the risk of alienation of guardianship, and is unable to adapt to changes in the mental status of the ward. The U.S. Multi-Review Network and the innovative reporting model of the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau and the Shanghai Jiading Court provide realistic models for system construction. China should introduce the concept of assisted decision-making, clarify the reporting responsibilities of guardians, build a pluralistic and co-governance review system centered on civil affairs departments and a guardianship information sharing mechanism, form a professional training and assessment mechanism for guardians, and promote the transformation of the guardianship supervision system from "passive relief" to "active prevention". Transformation of the guardianship supervision system from "passive relief" to "active prevention".

Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.Vol. 7(6)
China People's Public Security University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.