The Application of Free Evaluation of Evidence in the Litigation Process

As one of the methods for judges to hear cases during the litigation process, free evaluation of evidence is widely used by adjudicators. It can connect the facts of the case with real - life situations, achieve the unity of legal and social effects, and avoid the rigid and dogmatic characteristics of trials. With the development and evolution of the judicial proof model, corroboration has gradually differentiated from the principle of free evaluation of evidence and has been favored by adjudicators. Through practical verification and academic research, the conclusion is that the perfect integration of corroboration and free evaluation of evidence is the future of China's judicial proof model. However, at the same time, we cannot deny the defects of this system. This article will start from the dilemmas faced by the principle of free evaluation of evidence and formulate measures to ensure the better implementation of the system.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Law Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2025.040311
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Application of Free Evaluation of Evidence in the Litigation Process

Science of Law Journal
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

The Application of Free Evaluation of Evidence in the Litigation Process

article en

Abstract

As one of the methods for judges to hear cases during the litigation process, free evaluation of evidence is widely used by adjudicators. It can connect the facts of the case with real - life situations, achieve the unity of legal and social effects, and avoid the rigid and dogmatic characteristics of trials. With the development and evolution of the judicial proof model, corroboration has gradually differentiated from the principle of free evaluation of evidence and has been favored by adjudicators. Through practical verification and academic research, the conclusion is that the perfect integration of corroboration and free evaluation of evidence is the future of China's judicial proof model. However, at the same time, we cannot deny the defects of this system. This article will start from the dilemmas faced by the principle of free evaluation of evidence and formulate measures to ensure the better implementation of the system.

Science of Law JournalVol. 4(3)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.