THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS

The article is devoted to the social-philosophical analysis of consensus, which is one of the pressing issues of contemporary times. Consensus is regarded as a critical mechanism in ensuring both individual and collective welfare. The world is fraught with conflict zones that arise based on various motives and contentions, and simultaneously, efforts are made to seek solutions to these conflicts. In modern science, optimal consensus models and pacifist approaches are proposed, with attempts being made to define new directions for the development of conflictology. The article emphasizes that the resolution of social conflicts faces considerable challenges, as each new conflict emerges with its own unique content and scenario, necessitating different approaches for its resolution. These searches also encompass the philosophical, political, and legal aspects of public consciousness. Within the framework of the laws of social dynamics, efforts are made to bring conflicts to the consensus plane and to seek scientific solutions to them. In the article, the relationship between consensus and conflict, based on Hegelian logic, is explained through the structure of antithesis (conflict), thesis (dialogue), and synthesis (consensus). While dialogues aim for a predetermined consensus, conflict, in turn, promotes consensus through dialogues in a philosophical sense. This approach highlights the reciprocal relationship and interdependent nature between conflict and consensus. The limitations of idealizing consensus, as well as the difficulties in its realization, are linked to the impact of the multifaceted and multicontent social structure of contemporary society. The human factor plays a fundamental role in consensus, as moral values are crucial in conflict resolution. Social conflicts arise from the balance created between human nature and morality, reflecting the results of broader societal and state struggles. Ultimately, the achievement of consensus in social conflicts is a product of human moral and value-oriented consciousness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2025-2-14
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS

Vusala Loghman Gulmaliyeva
Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
article

THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS

Vusala Loghman Gulmaliyeva
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the social-philosophical analysis of consensus, which is one of the pressing issues of contemporary times. Consensus is regarded as a critical mechanism in ensuring both individual and collective welfare. The world is fraught with conflict zones that arise based on various motives and contentions, and simultaneously, efforts are made to seek solutions to these conflicts. In modern science, optimal consensus models and pacifist approaches are proposed, with attempts being made to define new directions for the development of conflictology. The article emphasizes that the resolution of social conflicts faces considerable challenges, as each new conflict emerges with its own unique content and scenario, necessitating different approaches for its resolution. These searches also encompass the philosophical, political, and legal aspects of public consciousness. Within the framework of the laws of social dynamics, efforts are made to bring conflicts to the consensus plane and to seek scientific solutions to them. In the article, the relationship between consensus and conflict, based on Hegelian logic, is explained through the structure of antithesis (conflict), thesis (dialogue), and synthesis (consensus). While dialogues aim for a predetermined consensus, conflict, in turn, promotes consensus through dialogues in a philosophical sense. This approach highlights the reciprocal relationship and interdependent nature between conflict and consensus. The limitations of idealizing consensus, as well as the difficulties in its realization, are linked to the impact of the multifaceted and multicontent social structure of contemporary society. The human factor plays a fundamental role in consensus, as moral values are crucial in conflict resolution. Social conflicts arise from the balance created between human nature and morality, reflecting the results of broader societal and state struggles. Ultimately, the achievement of consensus in social conflicts is a product of human moral and value-oriented consciousness.

Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences(2)
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (AZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS — Vusala Loghman Gulmaliyeva · Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS