Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints

ABSTRACT Agricultural producers face significant price risk, yet studies consistently find farmers use futures and options much less than predicted by optimal hedging models. Using nationally representative farm‐level data, we investigate two underexplored factors that can affect the use of exchange‐traded derivatives: historical basis risk and cash constraints. We show that corn and soybean farms located in counties that experienced a large, negative change in the corn basis between planting and harvest (a negative basis shock ) in the last 5 years are less likely to use futures contracts (6–12 percentage points) and options contracts (3–18 percentage points), but have a greater likelihood of marketing contract use (14–24 percentage points). We also find that farms with greater cash constraints ( lower cash holdings ) are less likely to use futures and options. We show that crop insurance, storage, and cooperative membership are complementary when using futures and options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Futures Markets
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22610
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints

Daniel Prager, Christopher Burns, Ryan Williams
Journal of Futures Markets
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints

Daniel Prager, Christopher Burns, Ryan Williams
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agricultural producers face significant price risk, yet studies consistently find farmers use futures and options much less than predicted by optimal hedging models. Using nationally representative farm‐level data, we investigate two underexplored factors that can affect the use of exchange‐traded derivatives: historical basis risk and cash constraints. We show that corn and soybean farms located in counties that experienced a large, negative change in the corn basis between planting and harvest (a negative basis shock ) in the last 5 years are less likely to use futures contracts (6–12 percentage points) and options contracts (3–18 percentage points), but have a greater likelihood of marketing contract use (14–24 percentage points). We also find that farms with greater cash constraints ( lower cash holdings ) are less likely to use futures and options. We show that crop insurance, storage, and cooperative membership are complementary when using futures and options.

Journal of Futures MarketsVol. 45(9)
Natural Resources Conservation Service (US), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints — Daniel Prager, Christopher Burns, et al. · Journal of Futures Markets (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS