Congenital anomaly registers in Australia: A national challenge

<b>Background:</b> Robust population health surveillance is required to monitor trends in prevalence in congenital anomalies (CA) and to detect emerging threats to human development. All eight Australian states and territories are mandated to report CA data to national authorities. <b>Objectives:</b> (i) Compare Australian congenital anomaly registers (CARs) across jurisdictions; (ii) measure research utilisation of Australian CAR data. <b>Method:</b> We conducted a documentary analysis of publicly available online information on Australian CARs and performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed research published from 1980 to 2024 that utilised CAR data. <b>Results:</b> Five Australian states/territories possessed an established CAR; three practiced active surveillance, and three included mandatory reporting. Age of child inclusion criteria ranged from birth episode to 6 years. Most states/territories classified CAs according to the <i>International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Australian Modification</i> (ICD-10-AM). There was inconsistency in scope, data sources, method of ascertainment, data linkage processes, data availability, reporting requirements and data quality. The scoping review identified 83 peer-reviewed publications using CAR data. The majority of publications originated from three states/territories and included key CAR staff as authors. Only one state/territory CAR consistently published research over the 44-year review period. <b>Conclusion:</b> There are major methodological inconsistencies among Australian CARs, undermining the interpretability and quality of nationally reported CA data. More standardisation and resourcing are required to maximise the research and policy value of Australian CARs. <b>Implications for health information management practice:</b> Urgent attention to data management practices, harmonisation across jurisdictions and resourcing are required to safeguard the sustainability and value of Australian CARs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251343623
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Congenital anomaly registers in Australia: A national challenge

Merilyn M. Riley, Lisa Hui
1 citations
Health Information Management Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
article

Congenital anomaly registers in Australia: A national challenge

Merilyn M. Riley, Lisa Hui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Robust population health surveillance is required to monitor trends in prevalence in congenital anomalies (CA) and to detect emerging threats to human development. All eight Australian states and territories are mandated to report CA data to national authorities. <b>Objectives:</b> (i) Compare Australian congenital anomaly registers (CARs) across jurisdictions; (ii) measure research utilisation of Australian CAR data. <b>Method:</b> We conducted a documentary analysis of publicly available online information on Australian CARs and performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed research published from 1980 to 2024 that utilised CAR data. <b>Results:</b> Five Australian states/territories possessed an established CAR; three practiced active surveillance, and three included mandatory reporting. Age of child inclusion criteria ranged from birth episode to 6 years. Most states/territories classified CAs according to the <i>International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Australian Modification</i> (ICD-10-AM). There was inconsistency in scope, data sources, method of ascertainment, data linkage processes, data availability, reporting requirements and data quality. The scoping review identified 83 peer-reviewed publications using CAR data. The majority of publications originated from three states/territories and included key CAR staff as authors. Only one state/territory CAR consistently published research over the 44-year review period. <b>Conclusion:</b> There are major methodological inconsistencies among Australian CARs, undermining the interpretability and quality of nationally reported CA data. More standardisation and resourcing are required to maximise the research and policy value of Australian CARs. <b>Implications for health information management practice:</b> Urgent attention to data management practices, harmonisation across jurisdictions and resourcing are required to safeguard the sustainability and value of Australian CARs.

Health Information Management JournalVol. 55(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Northern Health (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Mercy Hospital for Women (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.