Research Progress on Residual Cardiovascular Risk

即便在当今心血管疾病(CVD)的预防和治疗手段较前已获得显著的改善的情况下(如他汀调脂治疗、抗血小板治疗、控制血压等),大量患者在接受标准治疗后仍存在显著的残余心血管风险(Residual Cardiovascular Risk, RCR),RCR指尽管患者已接受基于指南推荐的标准治疗,但仍存在难以通过现有手段进一步降低的“硬终点”风险(指无法完全消除如心肌梗死、卒中、心血管死亡等心血管事件)。其定义随着对脂质代谢、炎症反应、代谢综合征的深入理解逐步扩展,现已成为心血管风险管理的重要方向。这一概念强调现代医学干预的局限性,并提示需超越传统危险因素管理,关注尚未被充分靶向的病理生理机制。本文通过查阅对比国内外相关文献,就残余心血管风险的相关概念、病理生理机制、相关生物标志物、新兴研究进展及干预策略进行综述,旨在为优化风险管理提供参考。Even with significant advancements in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) today—such as statin-based lipid management, antiplatelet therapy, and blood pressure control—a substantial number of patients still face considerable residual cardiovascular risk (RCR) despite receiving standard guideline-recommended therapies. RCR refers to the persistent risk of “hard endpoints” (such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) that remains difficult to further reduce with current interventions, even after optimal guideline-directed treatment. The definition of RCR has evolved with deeper insights into lipid metabolism, inflammatory responses, and metabolic syndrome, and it has now become a key focus in cardiovascular risk management. This concept highlights the limitations of modern medical interventions and underscores the need to look beyond traditional risk factor management by addressing underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that remain insufficiently targeted. By reviewing and comparing relevant domestic and international literature, this article provides a comprehensive overview of RCR, including its conceptual framework, pathophysiological mechanisms, associated biomarkers, emerging research advances, and potential intervention strategies. The aim is to offer insights for optimizing risk management approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1561779
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Progress on Residual Cardiovascular Risk

浩源 舒
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Research Progress on Residual Cardiovascular Risk

浩源 舒
article en

Abstract

即便在当今心血管疾病(CVD)的预防和治疗手段较前已获得显著的改善的情况下(如他汀调脂治疗、抗血小板治疗、控制血压等),大量患者在接受标准治疗后仍存在显著的残余心血管风险(Residual Cardiovascular Risk, RCR),RCR指尽管患者已接受基于指南推荐的标准治疗,但仍存在难以通过现有手段进一步降低的“硬终点”风险(指无法完全消除如心肌梗死、卒中、心血管死亡等心血管事件)。其定义随着对脂质代谢、炎症反应、代谢综合征的深入理解逐步扩展,现已成为心血管风险管理的重要方向。这一概念强调现代医学干预的局限性,并提示需超越传统危险因素管理,关注尚未被充分靶向的病理生理机制。本文通过查阅对比国内外相关文献,就残余心血管风险的相关概念、病理生理机制、相关生物标志物、新兴研究进展及干预策略进行综述,旨在为优化风险管理提供参考。Even with significant advancements in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) today—such as statin-based lipid management, antiplatelet therapy, and blood pressure control—a substantial number of patients still face considerable residual cardiovascular risk (RCR) despite receiving standard guideline-recommended therapies. RCR refers to the persistent risk of “hard endpoints” (such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) that remains difficult to further reduce with current interventions, even after optimal guideline-directed treatment. The definition of RCR has evolved with deeper insights into lipid metabolism, inflammatory responses, and metabolic syndrome, and it has now become a key focus in cardiovascular risk management. This concept highlights the limitations of modern medical interventions and underscores the need to look beyond traditional risk factor management by addressing underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that remain insufficiently targeted. By reviewing and comparing relevant domestic and international literature, this article provides a comprehensive overview of RCR, including its conceptual framework, pathophysiological mechanisms, associated biomarkers, emerging research advances, and potential intervention strategies. The aim is to offer insights for optimizing risk management approaches.

Advances in Clinical MedicineVol. 15(06)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research Progress on Residual Cardiovascular Risk — 浩源 舒 · Advances in Clinical Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS