Training needs assessment of judges: best practices

The article examines approaches to training needs assessment of judges in the context of international standards and best practices. Considering that the current Ukrainian legislation obliges each judge to maintain his qualifications at the appropriate level necessary for administration of justice, and at the same time provides for the right of a judge to raise his professional level, the authors emphasize the importance of training needs assessment for both initial and continuous judicial training, with the emphasise to specific judicial skills. The authors analyse the methodology of training needs assessment used in foreign judicial education institutions, namely German Deutschen Richterakademie and French École nationale de la magistrature, including the role of questionnaires and surveys, expert commissions, as well as standards of such international organizations as the EJTN and IOJT set up in the judicial training principles. The authors conclude that the international standards and best practices can guide national judicial training institutions in their activities, i.e. can serve as an important prerequisite for enriching and improving the existing system of judicial training needs assessment in Ukraine. A systematic approach to training needs assessment allows not only to adapt training programs to modern requirements but also contributes to the timely introduction of innovations in judicial training. It is important to ensure the independence of the assessment process to guarantee the relevance and validity of the results. The variety of methods used (questionnaires, surveys, observations, focus groups) ensures a comprehensive understanding of both the individual needs of judges and the overall effectiveness of judicial education. Key words: judicial training, training needs assessment, professional competence, judicial skills, administration of justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2025-1(50)-4
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training needs assessment of judges: best practices

Tetyana Fuley, Oleksandr Kravchuk
Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Training needs assessment of judges: best practices

Tetyana Fuley, Oleksandr Kravchuk
article en

Abstract

The article examines approaches to training needs assessment of judges in the context of international standards and best practices. Considering that the current Ukrainian legislation obliges each judge to maintain his qualifications at the appropriate level necessary for administration of justice, and at the same time provides for the right of a judge to raise his professional level, the authors emphasize the importance of training needs assessment for both initial and continuous judicial training, with the emphasise to specific judicial skills. The authors analyse the methodology of training needs assessment used in foreign judicial education institutions, namely German Deutschen Richterakademie and French École nationale de la magistrature, including the role of questionnaires and surveys, expert commissions, as well as standards of such international organizations as the EJTN and IOJT set up in the judicial training principles. The authors conclude that the international standards and best practices can guide national judicial training institutions in their activities, i.e. can serve as an important prerequisite for enriching and improving the existing system of judicial training needs assessment in Ukraine. A systematic approach to training needs assessment allows not only to adapt training programs to modern requirements but also contributes to the timely introduction of innovations in judicial training. It is important to ensure the independence of the assessment process to guarantee the relevance and validity of the results. The variety of methods used (questionnaires, surveys, observations, focus groups) ensures a comprehensive understanding of both the individual needs of judges and the overall effectiveness of judicial education. Key words: judicial training, training needs assessment, professional competence, judicial skills, administration of justice.

Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine(1(50))
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.