Cross-Sections of Positionality and Educational Research: The Experiences of Muslim Women in Academia

Abstract: This qualitative study examines the experiences of five Muslim women scholars in academia, focusing on the intersection of race, religion, and gender in predominantly secular institutions. Through Critical Race Methodology (CRM), and Muslim Critical Race Theory (MusCrit), we analyze how Muslim women navigate exclusionary academic spaces, particularly in the context of intensified Islamophobia. Drawing on narrative inquiry and thematic analysis, we uncover patterns of silencing, inclusivity, hypervisibility, impostor syndrome, and the complexities of allyship. Our findings reveal the multifaceted strategies Muslim women employ to reconcile their personal and professional lives within institutional structures that often fail to recognize religious diversity. This study enhances discussions on representation and systemic change in higher education, highlighting the necessity for truly inclusive environments that recognize and address the unique experiences of Muslim women scholars.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Education in Muslim Societies
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2979/jems.00028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Sections of Positionality and Educational Research: The Experiences of Muslim Women in Academia

Noor Ali, Fatima Seyma Kizil, Amaarah DeCuir, Sahar Khawaja et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Education in Muslim Societies
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
article

Cross-Sections of Positionality and Educational Research: The Experiences of Muslim Women in Academia

Noor Ali, Fatima Seyma Kizil, Amaarah DeCuir, Sahar Khawaja, Carolyn M. Lane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This qualitative study examines the experiences of five Muslim women scholars in academia, focusing on the intersection of race, religion, and gender in predominantly secular institutions. Through Critical Race Methodology (CRM), and Muslim Critical Race Theory (MusCrit), we analyze how Muslim women navigate exclusionary academic spaces, particularly in the context of intensified Islamophobia. Drawing on narrative inquiry and thematic analysis, we uncover patterns of silencing, inclusivity, hypervisibility, impostor syndrome, and the complexities of allyship. Our findings reveal the multifaceted strategies Muslim women employ to reconcile their personal and professional lives within institutional structures that often fail to recognize religious diversity. This study enhances discussions on representation and systemic change in higher education, highlighting the necessity for truly inclusive environments that recognize and address the unique experiences of Muslim women scholars.

The Journal of Education in Muslim SocietiesVol. 6(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-Sections of Positionality and Educational Research: The Experiences of Muslim Women in Academia — Noor Ali, Fatima Seyma Kizil, et al. · The Journal of Education in Muslim Societies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS