How do fertility facilities in Japan perceive disclosing institutional success rates for <scp>IVF</scp> ? A nationwide survey of registered assisted reproductive technology facilities

To evaluate the current perspectives on reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology, the authors conducted a nationwide survey. Of the 327 facilities that responded (response rate: 53.5%), over half recognized potential benefits of reporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates, such as aiding patients in selecting a clinic (68.5%) and enhancing the quality and efficiency of information provided to patients (62.1%). However, concerns regarding potential negative impacts, including patient selection bias, were also highlighted, albeit to a lesser extent (32.7%-52.3%). These findings underscore the need for further discussions to establish an unbiased reporting framework and improve patient education on assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12653
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do fertility facilities in Japan perceive disclosing institutional success rates for IVF ? A nationwide survey of registered assisted reproductive technology facilities

Akira Tsujimura, Osamu Ishihara, Yutaka Osuga, Seung Chik Jwa et al.
Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

How do fertility facilities in Japan perceive disclosing institutional success rates for IVF ? A nationwide survey of registered assisted reproductive technology facilities

Akira Tsujimura, Osamu Ishihara, Yutaka Osuga, Seung Chik Jwa, Eri Maeda, Yukihiro Terada
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the current perspectives on reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology, the authors conducted a nationwide survey. Of the 327 facilities that responded (response rate: 53.5%), over half recognized potential benefits of reporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates, such as aiding patients in selecting a clinic (68.5%) and enhancing the quality and efficiency of information provided to patients (62.1%). However, concerns regarding potential negative impacts, including patient selection bias, were also highlighted, albeit to a lesser extent (32.7%-52.3%). These findings underscore the need for further discussions to establish an unbiased reporting framework and improve patient education on assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rates.

Reproductive Medicine and BiologyVol. 24(1)
Jichi Medical University (JP), Kagawa Nutrition University (JP), Akita University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital (JP), Hokkaido Institute of Public Health (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do fertility facilities in Japan perceive disclosing institutional success rates for <scp>IVF</scp> ? A nationwide survey of registered assisted reproductive technology facilities — Akira Tsujimura, Osamu Ishihara, et al. · Reproductive Medicine and Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS