Does level of breast support differentially affect exertional symptoms and respiratory system responses in large- and small-breasted women during treadmill exercise?

We assessed how different levels of breast support affected exertional symptoms and respiratory responses in small- and large-breasted females during treadmill exercise. Twenty recreationally-active females (mean ± SD age: 22 ± 2 years) were divided into small (SBV: 322±77 mL) and large breast volume (LBV: 580±88 mL; <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>g</i> = 2.98) groups. Participants completed three 5 min bouts of treadmill exercise at 30%, 60%, and 90% of individual peak power output (PPO)-corresponding to walking, low-intensity running, and high-intensity running-wearing either a high-support or low-support sports bra (randomized). Measurements included cardiorespiratory variables, operating lung volumes, inspiratory muscle electromyographic, respiratory muscle pressures, breast acceleration, and exertional symptoms (breathlessness, chest tightness due to bra). High- versus low-support sports bras reduced mean breast acceleration (<i>p <</i> 0.001, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:math> =0.55), but evoked higher ratings of chest tightness (<i>p =</i> 0.040, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:math> =0.16) in LBV participants at low- and high-intensity running (<i>g</i> = 1.09 and <i>g</i> = 0.99, respectively). Although breathlessness was not significantly different by bra or breast volume (all <i>p</i> > 0.05), LBV participants consistently reported breathlessness intensity and unpleasantness ≥ 1 Borg unit (BU) higher than SBV participants during low- and high-intensity running (breathlessness intensity: ∼5 vs. ∼3 BU at 60% PPO; ∼9 vs. ∼7 BU at 90% PPO; breathlessness unpleasantness: ∼4 vs. ∼2 BU at 60% PPO, ∼8 vs. ∼6 BU at 90% PPO). There were no differences in cardiorespiratory variables, inspiratory muscle activity, operating lung volumes between breast volume groups or sports bras (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). We emphasize the importance of addressing subjective discomfort, including chest tightness and breathlessness, when developing effective breast support for weight-bearing exercise, especially for larger-breasted individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2025-0043
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does level of breast support differentially affect exertional symptoms and respiratory system responses in large- and small-breasted women during treadmill exercise?

Camilla R. Illidi, Dennis Jensen
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Does level of breast support differentially affect exertional symptoms and respiratory system responses in large- and small-breasted women during treadmill exercise?

Camilla R. Illidi, Dennis Jensen
article en

Abstract

We assessed how different levels of breast support affected exertional symptoms and respiratory responses in small- and large-breasted females during treadmill exercise. Twenty recreationally-active females (mean ± SD age: 22 ± 2 years) were divided into small (SBV: 322±77 mL) and large breast volume (LBV: 580±88 mL; <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>g</i> = 2.98) groups. Participants completed three 5 min bouts of treadmill exercise at 30%, 60%, and 90% of individual peak power output (PPO)-corresponding to walking, low-intensity running, and high-intensity running-wearing either a high-support or low-support sports bra (randomized). Measurements included cardiorespiratory variables, operating lung volumes, inspiratory muscle electromyographic, respiratory muscle pressures, breast acceleration, and exertional symptoms (breathlessness, chest tightness due to bra). High- versus low-support sports bras reduced mean breast acceleration (<i>p <</i> 0.001, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:math> =0.55), but evoked higher ratings of chest tightness (<i>p =</i> 0.040, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:math> =0.16) in LBV participants at low- and high-intensity running (<i>g</i> = 1.09 and <i>g</i> = 0.99, respectively). Although breathlessness was not significantly different by bra or breast volume (all <i>p</i> > 0.05), LBV participants consistently reported breathlessness intensity and unpleasantness ≥ 1 Borg unit (BU) higher than SBV participants during low- and high-intensity running (breathlessness intensity: ∼5 vs. ∼3 BU at 60% PPO; ∼9 vs. ∼7 BU at 90% PPO; breathlessness unpleasantness: ∼4 vs. ∼2 BU at 60% PPO, ∼8 vs. ∼6 BU at 90% PPO). There were no differences in cardiorespiratory variables, inspiratory muscle activity, operating lung volumes between breast volume groups or sports bras (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). We emphasize the importance of addressing subjective discomfort, including chest tightness and breathlessness, when developing effective breast support for weight-bearing exercise, especially for larger-breasted individuals.

Applied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismVol. 50
McGill University Health Centre (CA), McGill University (CA)
Mitacs
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.