A Comparison Between Upper and Bottom Layers in Bunker Silos: Performance of Dairy Cows

ABSTRACT Peripheral areas of horizontal silos are more susceptible to aerobic deterioration, which may affect silage quality. This two‐trials study evaluated the performance of Holstein cows fed diets containing corn silage from the upper or bottom half of a well‐managed bunker silo. In Trial 1, 20 cows were assigned to a 4 × 4 Latin Square design, with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, with 21‐days periods. The dietary treatments were (dry matter basis): 50% corn silage from the Top; 60% corn silage from the Top; 50% corn silage from the Bottom; and 60% corn silage from the Bottom. In Trial 2, 24 cows were assigned to a cross‐over design with two 21‐days periods. The treatments were: 60% corn silage from the Top and 60% corn silage from the Bottom. Corn silage was the sole forage source in both trials. In Trial 1, no interaction was observed among treatments. Cows fed Top silage had greater dry matter intake and milk yield ( p < 0.01), whereas feed efficiency ( p < 0.01) was higher for cows fed diets with 60% corn silage. In Trial 2, milk urea nitrogen increased ( p < 0.01) for cows fed Top compared with Bottom silage. Cows fed diets containing Bottom silage showed greater N retention ( p < 0.01), indicated by a more positive N balance ( p < 0.01). Collectively, this study suggests that under good silo management, the entire panel can be unloaded for feeding lactating dairy cows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Grass and Forage Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12728
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison Between Upper and Bottom Layers in Bunker Silos: Performance of Dairy Cows

Luiz Gustavo Nussio, Álvaro Wosniak Bispo, João Luiz Pratti Daniel, Paula de Almeida Carvalho‐Estrada et al.
Grass and Forage Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

A Comparison Between Upper and Bottom Layers in Bunker Silos: Performance of Dairy Cows

Luiz Gustavo Nussio, Álvaro Wosniak Bispo, João Luiz Pratti Daniel, Paula de Almeida Carvalho‐Estrada, Cristiano Kleinshmitt, Daniel Junges, G. Morais, Maximiliano Henrique de Oliveira Pasetti
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Peripheral areas of horizontal silos are more susceptible to aerobic deterioration, which may affect silage quality. This two‐trials study evaluated the performance of Holstein cows fed diets containing corn silage from the upper or bottom half of a well‐managed bunker silo. In Trial 1, 20 cows were assigned to a 4 × 4 Latin Square design, with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, with 21‐days periods. The dietary treatments were (dry matter basis): 50% corn silage from the Top; 60% corn silage from the Top; 50% corn silage from the Bottom; and 60% corn silage from the Bottom. In Trial 2, 24 cows were assigned to a cross‐over design with two 21‐days periods. The treatments were: 60% corn silage from the Top and 60% corn silage from the Bottom. Corn silage was the sole forage source in both trials. In Trial 1, no interaction was observed among treatments. Cows fed Top silage had greater dry matter intake and milk yield ( p < 0.01), whereas feed efficiency ( p < 0.01) was higher for cows fed diets with 60% corn silage. In Trial 2, milk urea nitrogen increased ( p < 0.01) for cows fed Top compared with Bottom silage. Cows fed diets containing Bottom silage showed greater N retention ( p < 0.01), indicated by a more positive N balance ( p < 0.01). Collectively, this study suggests that under good silo management, the entire panel can be unloaded for feeding lactating dairy cows.

Grass and Forage ScienceVol. 80(2)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.