The argument that external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign court judgments and its prospects

The recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments and rulings in the cross-border context have always been a crucial aspect of international trade transactions. Particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused a global economic halt, international trade disputes have surged, making the recognition and enforcement of international commercial judgments increasingly significant. The fraud exception in the cross-border recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments has emerged as a pressing issue. It is prevalent in practice and presents complex challenges that require resolution. This article will discuss whether external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign judgments.The aim is to logically outline the institutional framework for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in the realm of cross-border transactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Direito Internacional e Globalização Econômica
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71693
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The argument that external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign court judgments and its prospects

Gao Yan
Revista de Direito Internacional e Globalização Econômica
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

The argument that external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign court judgments and its prospects

Gao Yan
article en

Abstract

The recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments and rulings in the cross-border context have always been a crucial aspect of international trade transactions. Particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused a global economic halt, international trade disputes have surged, making the recognition and enforcement of international commercial judgments increasingly significant. The fraud exception in the cross-border recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments has emerged as a pressing issue. It is prevalent in practice and presents complex challenges that require resolution. This article will discuss whether external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign judgments.The aim is to logically outline the institutional framework for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in the realm of cross-border transactions.

Revista de Direito Internacional e Globalização EconômicaVol. 4(4-Ext)
Lanzhou University of Technology (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.