Current Status and Future Prospects of Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Focus on Reaction and Interface Engineering

Abstract The burgeoning development of solid‐state electrolytes significantly improves the safty and practicality of solid‐state lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs). Based on mature solid‐state electrolytes, challenges in electrochemical performance remain, largely due to complex reactions and interfacial issues on both sulfur and lithium sides. This review comprehensively examines the fundamental challenges and recent progress from the perspectives of reaction and interface. From a reaction standpoint, it discusses the trade‐off between shuttle effect and redox kinetics, as well as the irreversible accumulation of kinetically dead sulfur across different electrolytes, which were often overlooked. Regarding interfaces, it discusses the formation of interfacial dead sulfur within the cathode and strategies to enhance the across‐interface transport of charge carriers. It also analyzes mechanisms underlying lithium dendrite formation and interface failure, along with current solutions to mitigate dead lithium and extend lithium anode lifespan. In pursuit of meeting commercial demands for solid‐state LSBs, engineering parameters targeting high energy density are specified by formulations, and differences in parameter design principles among different electrolyte systems are systematically analyzed. Finally, to bridge fundamental insights with practical applications, future research directions are proposed, emphasizing reaction and interface engineering for high‐performance solid‐state LSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202501926
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Status and Future Prospects of Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Focus on Reaction and Interface Engineering

Guoxiu Wang, Zhenhua Sun, Zhuoyan Qu, Feng Li et al.
5 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
article

Current Status and Future Prospects of Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Focus on Reaction and Interface Engineering

Guoxiu Wang, Zhenhua Sun, Zhuoyan Qu, Feng Li, Junxing Ren, Ru Xiao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The burgeoning development of solid‐state electrolytes significantly improves the safty and practicality of solid‐state lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs). Based on mature solid‐state electrolytes, challenges in electrochemical performance remain, largely due to complex reactions and interfacial issues on both sulfur and lithium sides. This review comprehensively examines the fundamental challenges and recent progress from the perspectives of reaction and interface. From a reaction standpoint, it discusses the trade‐off between shuttle effect and redox kinetics, as well as the irreversible accumulation of kinetically dead sulfur across different electrolytes, which were often overlooked. Regarding interfaces, it discusses the formation of interfacial dead sulfur within the cathode and strategies to enhance the across‐interface transport of charge carriers. It also analyzes mechanisms underlying lithium dendrite formation and interface failure, along with current solutions to mitigate dead lithium and extend lithium anode lifespan. In pursuit of meeting commercial demands for solid‐state LSBs, engineering parameters targeting high energy density are specified by formulations, and differences in parameter design principles among different electrolyte systems are systematically analyzed. Finally, to bridge fundamental insights with practical applications, future research directions are proposed, emphasizing reaction and interface engineering for high‐performance solid‐state LSBs.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 16(8)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.