CONFORMAL APPROACH TO GAUSSIAN PROCESS SURROGATE EVALUATIONWITH MARGINAL COVERAGE GUARANTEES

Gaussian processes (GPs) are a Bayesian machine learning (ML) approach widely used to construct surrogate models for the uncertainty quantification (UQ) of computer simulation codes in industrial applications. It provides both a mean predictor and an estimate of the posterior prediction variance, the latter being used to produce Bayesian credibility intervals. Interpreting these intervals relies on the Gaussianity of the simulation model and the well-specification of the priors, which may not be appropriate. We propose to address this issue with the help of conformal prediction (CP), which is a finite-sample and distribution-free technique for estimating prediction intervals with marginal coverage guarantees. In the present work, a method for building adaptive cross-conformal prediction intervals is proposed by weighting the nonconformity score with the posterior standard deviation of the GP. The resulting CP intervals exhibit a level of adaptivity akin to Bayesian credibility sets and display a significant correlation with surrogate model local approximation error while being free from the underlying model assumptions and having marginal frequentist coverage guarantees. These estimators can be used to evaluate the quality of a GP surrogate model and can assist a decisionmaker in choosing the best prior to the specific application of the GP. We illustrate the proposed method's performance through a panel of numerical examples based on various computer experiments, including the GP metamodeling of analytical functions and an expensive-to-evaluate simulator of the clogging phenomenon in steam generators of nuclear reactors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1615/jmachlearnmodelcomput.2025054687
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONFORMAL APPROACH TO GAUSSIAN PROCESS SURROGATE EVALUATIONWITH MARGINAL COVERAGE GUARANTEES

Vincent Blot, Vincent Chabridon, Mathilde Mougeot, Didier Lucor et al.
3 citations
Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
7.44
article

CONFORMAL APPROACH TO GAUSSIAN PROCESS SURROGATE EVALUATIONWITH MARGINAL COVERAGE GUARANTEES

Vincent Blot, Vincent Chabridon, Mathilde Mougeot, Didier Lucor, Bertrand Iooss, Alessandro da Silva Leite, Edgar Jaber, Emmanuel Remy, Nicolas Brunel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Gaussian processes (GPs) are a Bayesian machine learning (ML) approach widely used to construct surrogate models for the uncertainty quantification (UQ) of computer simulation codes in industrial applications. It provides both a mean predictor and an estimate of the posterior prediction variance, the latter being used to produce Bayesian credibility intervals. Interpreting these intervals relies on the Gaussianity of the simulation model and the well-specification of the priors, which may not be appropriate. We propose to address this issue with the help of conformal prediction (CP), which is a finite-sample and distribution-free technique for estimating prediction intervals with marginal coverage guarantees. In the present work, a method for building adaptive cross-conformal prediction intervals is proposed by weighting the nonconformity score with the posterior standard deviation of the GP. The resulting CP intervals exhibit a level of adaptivity akin to Bayesian credibility sets and display a significant correlation with surrogate model local approximation error while being free from the underlying model assumptions and having marginal frequentist coverage guarantees. These estimators can be used to evaluate the quality of a GP surrogate model and can assist a decisionmaker in choosing the best prior to the specific application of the GP. We illustrate the proposed method's performance through a panel of numerical examples based on various computer experiments, including the GP metamodeling of analytical functions and an expensive-to-evaluate simulator of the clogging phenomenon in steam generators of nuclear reactors.

Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and ComputingVol. 6(3)
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Capgemini (Netherlands) (NL), Toulouse Mathematics Institute (FR), Capgemini (United States) (US), Électricité de France (France) (FR), Centre Borelli (FR), BorgWarner (Brazil) (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.