Optimal DC Motor Speed Control Comparison

The study compares the Linear Quadratic Tracking (LQT) controller with other widely used control strategies, including Proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controllers for optimal speed control of DC motors, focusing on its effectiveness in maintaining precise motor shaft rotation. The DC motor and controllers are tested in the MATLAB software in terms of standard performance metrics such as Steady-state Error (SSE), Rise Time (Tr), Settling Time (Ts), Overshoot (OS), Control Input Saturation, Integral of Absolute Error (IAE), Integral of Squared Error (ISE), Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE), and Control Effort. The results indicate that the LQT controller provides comparable performance, achieving near zero SSE, minimal overshoot, moderate rise and settling times, and efficient control effort. Although the PID controller provides the fastest response time, it is less suitable for applications that require stability and efficiency due to its significant overshoot and high control effort. The LQR controller, while highly energy-efficient, offers slower response times and incurs a slightly higher $S S E$, making it ideal for energy-conservation-focused applications. In contrast, the LQT controller exhibits a well-balanced performance in multiple measures, excelling in processing step input signals with zero error.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icece64886.2024.11024856
Primary Topic
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal DC Motor Speed Control Comparison

Md Khurram Monir Rabby, Asiful Islam Bhuiyan
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
article

Optimal DC Motor Speed Control Comparison

Md Khurram Monir Rabby, Asiful Islam Bhuiyan
article en

Abstract

The study compares the Linear Quadratic Tracking (LQT) controller with other widely used control strategies, including Proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controllers for optimal speed control of DC motors, focusing on its effectiveness in maintaining precise motor shaft rotation. The DC motor and controllers are tested in the MATLAB software in terms of standard performance metrics such as Steady-state Error (SSE), Rise Time (Tr), Settling Time (Ts), Overshoot (OS), Control Input Saturation, Integral of Absolute Error (IAE), Integral of Squared Error (ISE), Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE), and Control Effort. The results indicate that the LQT controller provides comparable performance, achieving near zero SSE, minimal overshoot, moderate rise and settling times, and efficient control effort. Although the PID controller provides the fastest response time, it is less suitable for applications that require stability and efficiency due to its significant overshoot and high control effort. The LQR controller, while highly energy-efficient, offers slower response times and incurs a slightly higher $S S E$, making it ideal for energy-conservation-focused applications. In contrast, the LQT controller exhibits a well-balanced performance in multiple measures, excelling in processing step input signals with zero error.

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US), Systems Technology (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.