Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Extracting Tree Canopy Cover using High-Resolution Imagery and Google Earth Engine

Accurate tree canopy cover (TCC) mapping is essential for managing forest ecosystems. Although machine learning (ML) methods have advanced remote sensing (RS) based image classification, there has been limited research on their effectiveness on TCC mapping. This study aims to compare different ML algorithms for TCC mapping under various conditions: (i) training sample sizes, (ii) parameter settings, and (iii) feature variable combinations. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) was employed to gain insights into the importance of features across classes. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed using various performance metrics, and statistical comparisons were conducted using McNemar's chi-squared test for class-wise performance and the two-proportion Z-test for overall accuracy (OA). The results indicated that tuning parameters, using moderate training sample sizes, and combining feature variables significantly enhanced the overall performance of all algorithms. Among them, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm consistently outperformed the others, achieving an accuracy of 81.19% before optimization and 89.52% after optimization. The SHAP analysis further revealed that the RF algorithm provided a balanced profile of feature importance across variables. These findings serve as a strong foundation for selecting algorithms to extract TCC information accurately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sustech63138.2025.11025678
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Extracting Tree Canopy Cover using High-Resolution Imagery and Google Earth Engine

Prajwol Babu Subedi, Hamdi A. Zurqani, Marco A. Yáñez, Michael A. Blazier et al.
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Extracting Tree Canopy Cover using High-Resolution Imagery and Google Earth Engine

Prajwol Babu Subedi, Hamdi A. Zurqani, Marco A. Yáñez, Michael A. Blazier, Kyle Cunningham
article en

Abstract

Accurate tree canopy cover (TCC) mapping is essential for managing forest ecosystems. Although machine learning (ML) methods have advanced remote sensing (RS) based image classification, there has been limited research on their effectiveness on TCC mapping. This study aims to compare different ML algorithms for TCC mapping under various conditions: (i) training sample sizes, (ii) parameter settings, and (iii) feature variable combinations. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) was employed to gain insights into the importance of features across classes. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed using various performance metrics, and statistical comparisons were conducted using McNemar's chi-squared test for class-wise performance and the two-proportion Z-test for overall accuracy (OA). The results indicated that tuning parameters, using moderate training sample sizes, and combining feature variables significantly enhanced the overall performance of all algorithms. Among them, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm consistently outperformed the others, achieving an accuracy of 81.19% before optimization and 89.52% after optimization. The SHAP analysis further revealed that the RF algorithm provided a balanced profile of feature importance across variables. These findings serve as a strong foundation for selecting algorithms to extract TCC information accurately.

University of Arkansas at Monticello (US), Arkansas Department of Agriculture (US)
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.