Examining Building Design Strategies for Zero Energy Performance: Operational Efficiency, Reconstruction, and Restoration for Sustainable Urban Development

The transition to renewable energy has become a pivotal factor in urban planning due to the rising costs and adverse environmental impacts of conventional energy sources, the growth of smart cities, and increasing population demands. As a significant energy consumer during operations, the building sector necessitates strategies to enhance the integration of renewable energy while minimizing reliance on traditional sources. Zero Energy Building (ZEB) is an innovative approach wherein a building generates an equivalent amount of energy from renewable sources, such as solar photovoltaic systems, to offset its conventional energy consumption. However, there is limited research on the influence of building shape on achieving zero-energy goals. This study addresses this gap by analyzing various design strategies for new construction, retrofits, reconstructions, and restorations to identify optimal building shapes for achieving zero-energy performance. The research modeled the operational performance of different building shapes by evaluating energy production and consumption. Each design is optimized based on energy outcomes to determine the ideal configurations for ZEBs. The findings revealed that building shape significantly impacts operational performance. The one-story house emerged as the most favorable ZEB configuration. It achieved a net energy production of 167 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year, surpassing its annual energy demand despite its initially high energy usage. Conversely, achieving zero-energy was challenging for a two-story design (206 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year), whereas an alternative two-story design nearly met the target with a net energy of -0.69 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year. Implementing a ZEB retrofit approach significantly reduced operational energy from 293 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year to 91.4 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year for a tower design. These findings underscore the critical role of building shape in ZEB performance and provide valuable insights for future urban planning and energy-efficient building designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sustech63138.2025.11025561
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Building Design Strategies for Zero Energy Performance: Operational Efficiency, Reconstruction, and Restoration for Sustainable Urban Development

Emad Elwakil, Elsayed Salem
2 links
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Examining Building Design Strategies for Zero Energy Performance: Operational Efficiency, Reconstruction, and Restoration for Sustainable Urban Development

Emad Elwakil, Elsayed Salem
article en

Abstract

The transition to renewable energy has become a pivotal factor in urban planning due to the rising costs and adverse environmental impacts of conventional energy sources, the growth of smart cities, and increasing population demands. As a significant energy consumer during operations, the building sector necessitates strategies to enhance the integration of renewable energy while minimizing reliance on traditional sources. Zero Energy Building (ZEB) is an innovative approach wherein a building generates an equivalent amount of energy from renewable sources, such as solar photovoltaic systems, to offset its conventional energy consumption. However, there is limited research on the influence of building shape on achieving zero-energy goals. This study addresses this gap by analyzing various design strategies for new construction, retrofits, reconstructions, and restorations to identify optimal building shapes for achieving zero-energy performance. The research modeled the operational performance of different building shapes by evaluating energy production and consumption. Each design is optimized based on energy outcomes to determine the ideal configurations for ZEBs. The findings revealed that building shape significantly impacts operational performance. The one-story house emerged as the most favorable ZEB configuration. It achieved a net energy production of 167 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year, surpassing its annual energy demand despite its initially high energy usage. Conversely, achieving zero-energy was challenging for a two-story design (206 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year), whereas an alternative two-story design nearly met the target with a net energy of -0.69 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year. Implementing a ZEB retrofit approach significantly reduced operational energy from 293 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year to 91.4 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/year for a tower design. These findings underscore the critical role of building shape in ZEB performance and provide valuable insights for future urban planning and energy-efficient building designs.

Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.