Is More or Less Automation Better? An Investigation into the LLM4TDD Process

In today’s society, we are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems. However, we also constantly witness the negative impacts of buggy software. To produce more reliable code, recent work introduced the LLM4TDD process, which guides Large Language Models to generate code iteratively using a test-driven development methodology. This work highlights the promise of the LLM4TDD process, but reveals that the quality of the code generated is dependent on the test cases used as prompts. Therefore, this paper conducts an empirical study to investigate how different test generation strategies can impact the quality of code produced by the LLM4TDD workflow as well as the impact on overall effort to conduct the LLM4TDD process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/llm4code66737.2025.00025
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is More or Less Automation Better? An Investigation into the LLM4TDD Process

Anahita Samadi, Allison Sullivan, Sanyogita Piya
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Is More or Less Automation Better? An Investigation into the LLM4TDD Process

Anahita Samadi, Allison Sullivan, Sanyogita Piya
article en

Abstract

In today’s society, we are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems. However, we also constantly witness the negative impacts of buggy software. To produce more reliable code, recent work introduced the LLM4TDD process, which guides Large Language Models to generate code iteratively using a test-driven development methodology. This work highlights the promise of the LLM4TDD process, but reveals that the quality of the code generated is dependent on the test cases used as prompts. Therefore, this paper conducts an empirical study to investigate how different test generation strategies can impact the quality of code produced by the LLM4TDD workflow as well as the impact on overall effort to conduct the LLM4TDD process.

The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.