Applying Factored Evolutionary Algorithms to the B-Spline Knot Selection Problem

Stochastic search algorithms are an effective method for solving the B-spline knot selection problem. Unfortunately, they often require a large number of (in this case, expensive) fitness function evaluations to find good solutions. In an attempt to mitigate this issue, we apply a modern cooperative coevolutionary algorithm – Factored Evolutionary Algorithms (FEAs) – to the B-spline knot selection problem. We demonstrate FEA’s performance on a variety of benchmark functions, and we compare FEA to traditional stochastic search methods. We also propose an FEA-specific method to evaluate Mean Squared Error (MSE) more efficiently, thus reducing the theoretical runtime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/alife-ciscompanion65078.2025.11031042
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Factored Evolutionary Algorithms to the B-Spline Knot Selection Problem

John Sheppard, Jordan Schupbach, Nicholas Turk, Eve Ginsberg
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
article

Applying Factored Evolutionary Algorithms to the B-Spline Knot Selection Problem

John Sheppard, Jordan Schupbach, Nicholas Turk, Eve Ginsberg
article en

Abstract

Stochastic search algorithms are an effective method for solving the B-spline knot selection problem. Unfortunately, they often require a large number of (in this case, expensive) fitness function evaluations to find good solutions. In an attempt to mitigate this issue, we apply a modern cooperative coevolutionary algorithm – Factored Evolutionary Algorithms (FEAs) – to the B-spline knot selection problem. We demonstrate FEA’s performance on a variety of benchmark functions, and we compare FEA to traditional stochastic search methods. We also propose an FEA-specific method to evaluate Mean Squared Error (MSE) more efficiently, thus reducing the theoretical runtime.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Montana State University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.