Ibn Taymiyyah’s Version of Corporealism of God

In Abrahamic tradition, the question of God’s relationship with body, space and direction is an inescapable philosophical and theological issue and Islam is not an exception. The Central text of Islam, Quran, contains verses that anthropomorphically attributes “hands”, “eyes”, “face” “establishment upon throne” referencing God. These verses have for centuries sparked among the Muslim philosophers and theologians, centuries of debate; leading to diverse interpretations and theological schools of thought. Ibn Taymiyyah and Fahr al-Din al-Rāzī are two of those prominent figures who also debated this issue. Ibn Taymiyyah takes the relational ontology of space and doesn't negate the prediction of the body to God. On the other hand, Fahr al-Dīn al-Rāzī an Ash’ari theologian negates all kinds of anthropomorphic attribution for God. This paper presents Ibn Taymiyyah’s position on God's body and his conflict with Ash’ari scholar Fahr al-Dīn al-Rāzī.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
HISTORICAL Journal of History and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58355/historical.v4i2.169
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ibn Taymiyyah’s Version of Corporealism of God

Roshlan Rahman Dipto
HISTORICAL Journal of History and Social Sciences
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Ibn Taymiyyah’s Version of Corporealism of God

Roshlan Rahman Dipto
article en

Abstract

In Abrahamic tradition, the question of God’s relationship with body, space and direction is an inescapable philosophical and theological issue and Islam is not an exception. The Central text of Islam, Quran, contains verses that anthropomorphically attributes “hands”, “eyes”, “face” “establishment upon throne” referencing God. These verses have for centuries sparked among the Muslim philosophers and theologians, centuries of debate; leading to diverse interpretations and theological schools of thought. Ibn Taymiyyah and Fahr al-Din al-Rāzī are two of those prominent figures who also debated this issue. Ibn Taymiyyah takes the relational ontology of space and doesn't negate the prediction of the body to God. On the other hand, Fahr al-Dīn al-Rāzī an Ash’ari theologian negates all kinds of anthropomorphic attribution for God. This paper presents Ibn Taymiyyah’s position on God's body and his conflict with Ash’ari scholar Fahr al-Dīn al-Rāzī.

HISTORICAL Journal of History and Social SciencesVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.