Precarity in/as Critical Practice

Abstract This essay considers the widening range and plurality of critical approaches in the field of poetry criticism as part of a broader impulse in humanistic discourses to find new ways of approaching critical study that likewise reflect and respond to the precarious conditions surrounding the act of study itself. Beginning with a brief sampling of recent critical works reflective of increasing generic hybridity, I trace some of the historical roots of these developments and consider the complex nature of precarity itself. In the increasing hybridity and plurality at play contemporary work across literary-critical subfields the motivations, methodologies, and definitions (implicit or explicit), we find the emergence of a precarity poetics that is both formal and definitional, both fraught and generative, rooted in its surrounding material, environmental, and institutional conditions. The second half reflects on how an awareness of precarity’s multivalences as both condition and a potential poetics informs my own research and recent writing. In closing, I offer some provisional notes toward articulating and cultivating a precarity poetics as intentional methodology and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Literary History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajaf039
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precarity in/as Critical Practice

Lucy Alford
American Literary History
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

Precarity in/as Critical Practice

Lucy Alford
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay considers the widening range and plurality of critical approaches in the field of poetry criticism as part of a broader impulse in humanistic discourses to find new ways of approaching critical study that likewise reflect and respond to the precarious conditions surrounding the act of study itself. Beginning with a brief sampling of recent critical works reflective of increasing generic hybridity, I trace some of the historical roots of these developments and consider the complex nature of precarity itself. In the increasing hybridity and plurality at play contemporary work across literary-critical subfields the motivations, methodologies, and definitions (implicit or explicit), we find the emergence of a precarity poetics that is both formal and definitional, both fraught and generative, rooted in its surrounding material, environmental, and institutional conditions. The second half reflects on how an awareness of precarity’s multivalences as both condition and a potential poetics informs my own research and recent writing. In closing, I offer some provisional notes toward articulating and cultivating a precarity poetics as intentional methodology and practice.

American Literary HistoryVol. 37(2)
Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Precarity in/as Critical Practice — Lucy Alford · American Literary History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS