The Novel as Communal Form: H. T. Tsiang’s Asiatic Mode of Literary Production

Abstract Focusing on his 1937 novel And China Has Hands, this article shows how H. T. Tsiang used romantic anticapitalism to contest settler-colonialist notions of Asian economic efficiency, as well as the frequent equation of Asian subjects with abstract capital. Specifically, Tsiang drew from Marx’s long-discredited Asiatic Mode of Production (AMP) to turn our understanding of “Asiatic form” from economic efficiency to communal property, while also critiquing both imperialism in Asia and racial capitalism in the US. The article then finds in Tsiang’s use of the AMP a portable way of reading and writing geared towards claiming the past as a resource for communism rather than fascism. The key here is Tsiang’s literary unevenness, identified here as his “communal form”: the novel’s juxtaposition of modern and archaic modes of production through a combination of proletarian realism, experimental modernism, and romantic anticapitalism. The result is a case study of advancing reliably progressive ends via visions of prelapsarian wholeness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Literary History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajaf035
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Novel as Communal Form: H. T. Tsiang’s Asiatic Mode of Literary Production

Steven S. Lee
American Literary History
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Novel as Communal Form: H. T. Tsiang’s Asiatic Mode of Literary Production

Steven S. Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Focusing on his 1937 novel And China Has Hands, this article shows how H. T. Tsiang used romantic anticapitalism to contest settler-colonialist notions of Asian economic efficiency, as well as the frequent equation of Asian subjects with abstract capital. Specifically, Tsiang drew from Marx’s long-discredited Asiatic Mode of Production (AMP) to turn our understanding of “Asiatic form” from economic efficiency to communal property, while also critiquing both imperialism in Asia and racial capitalism in the US. The article then finds in Tsiang’s use of the AMP a portable way of reading and writing geared towards claiming the past as a resource for communism rather than fascism. The key here is Tsiang’s literary unevenness, identified here as his “communal form”: the novel’s juxtaposition of modern and archaic modes of production through a combination of proletarian realism, experimental modernism, and romantic anticapitalism. The result is a case study of advancing reliably progressive ends via visions of prelapsarian wholeness.

American Literary HistoryVol. 37(2)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.