Efficiency evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in serving research considering heterogeneity based on DEA: a case study of national science data centers in China

Abstract Scientific research is increasingly highlighting the significance of scientific data. This trend has led to the emergence of scientific data sharing platforms, which are tasked with managing scientific data and promoting the open sharing of data resources. The objective of this paper is to assess the efficiency of these platforms in supporting research, extending the analytical lens of research evaluation from conventional actor-centric evaluations to a platform-oriented perspective. We construct a two-stage efficiency evaluation model based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method and propose a methodology for mitigating the impact of heterogeneity on evaluation outcomes through adjustment coefficient. A case study of China’s national science data centers is conducted. According to the calculation results and findings of this study, it is recommended that the national science data centers establish a differentiated resource optimization mechanism that prioritizes stage efficiency, which aligns with the institutional demand for a platform-based scientific research paradigm in the digital economy era. The national science data centers should establish subject-differentiated data service strategies. It is suggested to integrate the efficiency results of dynamic evaluation with the experience of benchmarking centers to conduct classification optimization for data centers, addressing technical deficiencies and management bottlenecks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Evaluation
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf023
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in serving research considering heterogeneity based on DEA: a case study of national science data centers in China

Qiuhong Zhao, Guo-liang Yang, Yanchun Ma, Yuxin Gao et al.
Research Evaluation
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Efficiency evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in serving research considering heterogeneity based on DEA: a case study of national science data centers in China

Qiuhong Zhao, Guo-liang Yang, Yanchun Ma, Yuxin Gao, Xianrui Yu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scientific research is increasingly highlighting the significance of scientific data. This trend has led to the emergence of scientific data sharing platforms, which are tasked with managing scientific data and promoting the open sharing of data resources. The objective of this paper is to assess the efficiency of these platforms in supporting research, extending the analytical lens of research evaluation from conventional actor-centric evaluations to a platform-oriented perspective. We construct a two-stage efficiency evaluation model based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method and propose a methodology for mitigating the impact of heterogeneity on evaluation outcomes through adjustment coefficient. A case study of China’s national science data centers is conducted. According to the calculation results and findings of this study, it is recommended that the national science data centers establish a differentiated resource optimization mechanism that prioritizes stage efficiency, which aligns with the institutional demand for a platform-based scientific research paradigm in the digital economy era. The national science data centers should establish subject-differentiated data service strategies. It is suggested to integrate the efficiency results of dynamic evaluation with the experience of benchmarking centers to conduct classification optimization for data centers, addressing technical deficiencies and management bottlenecks.

Research EvaluationVol. 34
Beijing Technology and Business University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), Simulation Technologies (United States) (US), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beihang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.