Islands Promote Diversification of the Silvereye Species Complex: A Phylogenomic Analysis of a Great Speciator

Geographic isolation plays a pivotal role in speciation by restricting gene flow between populations through distance or physical barriers. However, the speciation process is complex, influenced by the interplay between dispersal ability and geographic isolation, as seen in "great speciators" - bird species that simultaneously have broad island distributions but high levels of subspecific diversity. Comparing genomic population differentiation in species that occupy both continental and island settings can reveal the effects of different forms of geographic isolation and validate if the primary mechanism proposed to catalyse a great speciator pattern, that is, dispersal reduction following island colonisation, has occurred. The highly diverse white-eye family Zosteropidae includes several great speciators, including the silvereye (Zosterops lateralis), with 16 subspecies (11 occurring on islands), distributed on the Australian continent and numerous southwest Pacific islands. We compared continental and island patterns of divergence using whole genome and morphological data. Australian mainland populations showed a low genetic population structure, lack of isolation by distance patterns and low morphological diagnosability, suggesting that the species' dispersal propensity in a continental setting is sufficient to overcome multiple forms of geographic barriers and large geographic distances. In contrast, except for island populations less than 200 years old, most island populations were highly genomically structured with clearer morphological diagnosability even if separated by relatively short geographic distances. The inferred reduction of dispersal propensity in island situations is consistent with the proposed model of great speciator formation on islands. Our phylogenomic analyses also allowed resolution of the silvereyes' evolutionary position, showing their relatively early emergence (~1.5 Mya) within the rapidly radiating Zosteropidae, while population-level analyses demonstrated where morphological subspecies and genomic data align and disagree. However, the silvereye example also shows how uncertainties about relationships remain when reconstructing evolutionary history in rapidly radiating groups, even when whole genome data is available. Altogether, our results show how within-species genomic and morphological patterns measured over broad spatial scales and with varying geographic contexts can help reveal when particular stages of speciation such as great speciators are likely to emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Ecology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17830
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Islands Promote Diversification of the Silvereye Species Complex: A Phylogenomic Analysis of a Great Speciator

Dominique A. Potvin, Nilo Merino Recalde, William Goulding, Sonya M. Clegg et al.
3 citations
Molecular Ecology
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.45
article

Islands Promote Diversification of the Silvereye Species Complex: A Phylogenomic Analysis of a Great Speciator

Dominique A. Potvin, Nilo Merino Recalde, William Goulding, Sonya M. Clegg, Ashley T. Sendell‐Price, Bruce C. Robertson, Andrea Estandía
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Geographic isolation plays a pivotal role in speciation by restricting gene flow between populations through distance or physical barriers. However, the speciation process is complex, influenced by the interplay between dispersal ability and geographic isolation, as seen in "great speciators" - bird species that simultaneously have broad island distributions but high levels of subspecific diversity. Comparing genomic population differentiation in species that occupy both continental and island settings can reveal the effects of different forms of geographic isolation and validate if the primary mechanism proposed to catalyse a great speciator pattern, that is, dispersal reduction following island colonisation, has occurred. The highly diverse white-eye family Zosteropidae includes several great speciators, including the silvereye (Zosterops lateralis), with 16 subspecies (11 occurring on islands), distributed on the Australian continent and numerous southwest Pacific islands. We compared continental and island patterns of divergence using whole genome and morphological data. Australian mainland populations showed a low genetic population structure, lack of isolation by distance patterns and low morphological diagnosability, suggesting that the species' dispersal propensity in a continental setting is sufficient to overcome multiple forms of geographic barriers and large geographic distances. In contrast, except for island populations less than 200 years old, most island populations were highly genomically structured with clearer morphological diagnosability even if separated by relatively short geographic distances. The inferred reduction of dispersal propensity in island situations is consistent with the proposed model of great speciator formation on islands. Our phylogenomic analyses also allowed resolution of the silvereyes' evolutionary position, showing their relatively early emergence (~1.5 Mya) within the rapidly radiating Zosteropidae, while population-level analyses demonstrated where morphological subspecies and genomic data align and disagree. However, the silvereye example also shows how uncertainties about relationships remain when reconstructing evolutionary history in rapidly radiating groups, even when whole genome data is available. Altogether, our results show how within-species genomic and morphological patterns measured over broad spatial scales and with varying geographic contexts can help reveal when particular stages of speciation such as great speciators are likely to emerge.

Molecular EcologyVol. 34(14)
Griffith University (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Queensland Museum (AU), University of Oxford (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
National Geographic Society, Linnean Society of NSW, Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Genetics Society, Royal Society Te Apārangi, Griffith University, Natural Environment Research Council, St. John's College, University of Oxford, Marsden Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.