Is China decoupling from the global value chain? A quantitative analysis framework based on the global production network

In recent years, frequent global emergencies have disrupted international stability and prompted countries to decouple from Global Value Chain (GVC), raising critical questions about how to restore and manage the extent of such decoupling to mitigate risks. From a systems science perspective, this paper constructs a Global Industrial Value Chain Network model based on Multi-Regional Input-Output data and proposes a theoretical framework for quantitatively assessing the degree of decoupling of economies and industries within GVC. Using the U.S.’s new trade remedy measures as a case study, the paper analyzes their impact on China and key “transit” countries involved in global trade networks. The analysis reveals that industries heavily engaged in intermediate goods trade exhibit greater stability in the face of global disruptions compared to resource-based sectors. Moreover, highly integrated, advanced economies demonstrate strong resilience by effectively leveraging external resources. Despite the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s GVC connections have been reinforced, reflecting its adaptive capacity. The findings also indicate that China’s emphasis on domestic circulation has enhanced its ability to withstand Western trade challenges. Furthermore, multilateral trade agreements and “backdoor” export strategies serve as effective short-term measures to circumvent U.S. trade restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05183-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is China decoupling from the global value chain? A quantitative analysis framework based on the global production network

Lizhi Xing, Chuke Jiang
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Is China decoupling from the global value chain? A quantitative analysis framework based on the global production network

Lizhi Xing, Chuke Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, frequent global emergencies have disrupted international stability and prompted countries to decouple from Global Value Chain (GVC), raising critical questions about how to restore and manage the extent of such decoupling to mitigate risks. From a systems science perspective, this paper constructs a Global Industrial Value Chain Network model based on Multi-Regional Input-Output data and proposes a theoretical framework for quantitatively assessing the degree of decoupling of economies and industries within GVC. Using the U.S.’s new trade remedy measures as a case study, the paper analyzes their impact on China and key “transit” countries involved in global trade networks. The analysis reveals that industries heavily engaged in intermediate goods trade exhibit greater stability in the face of global disruptions compared to resource-based sectors. Moreover, highly integrated, advanced economies demonstrate strong resilience by effectively leveraging external resources. Despite the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s GVC connections have been reinforced, reflecting its adaptive capacity. The findings also indicate that China’s emphasis on domestic circulation has enhanced its ability to withstand Western trade challenges. Furthermore, multilateral trade agreements and “backdoor” export strategies serve as effective short-term measures to circumvent U.S. trade restrictions.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Beijing University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.