Study on Stakeholder Perceptions of the Institutional Settlement of Rural Spatial Planning

This study analyzed the stakeholders’ perceptions about implementing the Rural Spatial Planning system introduced under the Rural Space Reorganization Act. A survey of 200 participants, including government officials, planners, and researchers, identified key rural issues such as population decline (64.0%), infrastructure deficiency (34.0%), and unplanned development (15.0%). In particular, 30.5% expected these problems to worsen. Improving settlement conditions (34.9%) and expanding public services (24.0%) were prioritized policy goals. The key strategies included systematic planning (38.4%) and facility clustering (24.7%). The stakeholders also emphasized the need for rural specialized zones, community-led planning, and capacity building (36.0%). Clear government guidelines (46.0%) and streamlined procedures were considered essential for enhancing the effectiveness of the Rural Agreement. The findings offer practical insights into stakeholder needs and can inform efficient and sustainable rural spatial planning moving forward.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Journal of Community Living Science
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2025.36.2.303
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Stakeholder Perceptions of the Institutional Settlement of Rural Spatial Planning

Jinah Choi, Suyeon Kim, Jason C Yu
The Korean Journal of Community Living Science
Regional Development and Environment
article

Study on Stakeholder Perceptions of the Institutional Settlement of Rural Spatial Planning

Jinah Choi, Suyeon Kim, Jason C Yu
article en

Abstract

This study analyzed the stakeholders’ perceptions about implementing the Rural Spatial Planning system introduced under the Rural Space Reorganization Act. A survey of 200 participants, including government officials, planners, and researchers, identified key rural issues such as population decline (64.0%), infrastructure deficiency (34.0%), and unplanned development (15.0%). In particular, 30.5% expected these problems to worsen. Improving settlement conditions (34.9%) and expanding public services (24.0%) were prioritized policy goals. The key strategies included systematic planning (38.4%) and facility clustering (24.7%). The stakeholders also emphasized the need for rural specialized zones, community-led planning, and capacity building (36.0%). Clear government guidelines (46.0%) and streamlined procedures were considered essential for enhancing the effectiveness of the Rural Agreement. The findings offer practical insights into stakeholder needs and can inform efficient and sustainable rural spatial planning moving forward.

The Korean Journal of Community Living ScienceVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.