Using a digital participatory platform to evaluate public space quality

Abstract Decision-making processes in the planning, designing, and maintenance of public spaces still overwhelmingly do not allow for sufficient articulation and consideration of the needs and aspirations of local residents. Recent research shows that digital tools can facilitate social participation and allow stakeholders to voice and discuss their perceptions of public space usage. However, apart from legal challenges, limited budgets and digital literacy frequently constrain the use of digital information technology to such ends. This paper demonstrates how a novel digital participatory platform (DPP) named AMACHAN supports an in-situ public space quality evaluation in two Mexican cities. We evaluated the quality of six public spaces with local residents in the cities of Puebla and Mexico City. We also investigated what benefit and potential the involved government and other relevant stakeholders see in integrating a public space quality evaluation using a DPP into their work processes for public space management. Among government practitioners, we observed limited knowledge of implementing a public space evaluation using a DPP and spatial data. We provide insights into overcoming such challenges and demonstrate that bottom-up approaches motivate residents to use a DPP when they see that the data they contribute is discussed among decision-makers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeoJournal
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-025-11383-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a digital participatory platform to evaluate public space quality

Frank Ostermann, Sergio Alvarado Vazquez, Ana Mafalda Madureira, Karin Pfeffer
2 citations
GeoJournal
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Using a digital participatory platform to evaluate public space quality

Frank Ostermann, Sergio Alvarado Vazquez, Ana Mafalda Madureira, Karin Pfeffer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Decision-making processes in the planning, designing, and maintenance of public spaces still overwhelmingly do not allow for sufficient articulation and consideration of the needs and aspirations of local residents. Recent research shows that digital tools can facilitate social participation and allow stakeholders to voice and discuss their perceptions of public space usage. However, apart from legal challenges, limited budgets and digital literacy frequently constrain the use of digital information technology to such ends. This paper demonstrates how a novel digital participatory platform (DPP) named AMACHAN supports an in-situ public space quality evaluation in two Mexican cities. We evaluated the quality of six public spaces with local residents in the cities of Puebla and Mexico City. We also investigated what benefit and potential the involved government and other relevant stakeholders see in integrating a public space quality evaluation using a DPP into their work processes for public space management. Among government practitioners, we observed limited knowledge of implementing a public space evaluation using a DPP and spatial data. We provide insights into overcoming such challenges and demonstrate that bottom-up approaches motivate residents to use a DPP when they see that the data they contribute is discussed among decision-makers.

GeoJournalVol. 90(3)
Institute for Urban and Regional Research (AT), Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences (BY), Mediant Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using a digital participatory platform to evaluate public space quality — Frank Ostermann, Sergio Alvarado Vazquez, et al. · GeoJournal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS