Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Crimes According to Company Culture Theory

The current concept of corporations involves treating their wealth, rights, obligations, and specific interests or goals as separate from the individuals who manage and operate these legal entities. Criminal responsibility for actions committed by corporations is assigned to both the corporations themselves and their managers through the lens of company culture theory. The challenge lies in understanding how the application of company culture theory influences the criminal liability of corporations, particularly in cases of environmental crimes, as reflected in court decisions. This study reveals that when assessing criminal liability based on company culture theory, corporations are viewed as real entities accountable for their own mistakes. These mistakes may arise from corporate procedures, policies, or practices that are generally accepted within the organization. For example, in the Decision of the District Court No. 349/Pid.B/LH2019/PN PLW, the judge considered the failure of PT. SSS to comply with its company culture. This non-compliance refers to practices that are typically accepted and implemented within its business operations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0705360367
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Crimes According to Company Culture Theory

Edi Suhaedi Edi Suhaedi, Sodikin Sodikin
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Crimes According to Company Culture Theory

Edi Suhaedi Edi Suhaedi, Sodikin Sodikin
article en

Abstract

The current concept of corporations involves treating their wealth, rights, obligations, and specific interests or goals as separate from the individuals who manage and operate these legal entities. Criminal responsibility for actions committed by corporations is assigned to both the corporations themselves and their managers through the lens of company culture theory. The challenge lies in understanding how the application of company culture theory influences the criminal liability of corporations, particularly in cases of environmental crimes, as reflected in court decisions. This study reveals that when assessing criminal liability based on company culture theory, corporations are viewed as real entities accountable for their own mistakes. These mistakes may arise from corporate procedures, policies, or practices that are generally accepted within the organization. For example, in the Decision of the District Court No. 349/Pid.B/LH2019/PN PLW, the judge considered the failure of PT. SSS to comply with its company culture. This non-compliance refers to practices that are typically accepted and implemented within its business operations.

International Journal of Advances in Engineering and ManagementVol. 7(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Crimes According to Company Culture Theory — Edi Suhaedi Edi Suhaedi, Sodikin Sodikin · International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS