Needs and pathways for strengthening the contribution of qualitative methods toward more effective impact assessment practice

Many jurisdictions are looking to next-generation impact assessment (IA) that includes sustainability considerations that extend beyond biophysical. Subjectivity is inherent in many of these additional impact considerations, and they are often not easily nor effectively quantified. Delivering effective IA within this broadening scope requires new, innovative, and rigorous applications of qualitative methods that enable meaningful inclusion of diverse knowledges, values, and information. While many qualitative methods are available for IA, there remains a significant opportunity to strengthen their contribution toward more effective IA practice. As such, we establish in this paper needs that must be addressed if qualitative methods are to meaningfully contribute to IA and pathways for acting on these needs. Relating findings from a survey, semi-structured interviews, and a world café, the paper specifically identifies six key needs for enhancing the effective use of qualitative methods in IA, and five pathways for addressing these needs that involve all IA actors. We conclude that there are deeply entrenched assumptions about qualitative methods and that shifting these views will be challenging and take time. Together, the identified needs and pathways provide a framework for action to improve the effectiveness of IA and should be considered in IA training and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2025.2515776
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Needs and pathways for strengthening the contribution of qualitative methods toward more effective impact assessment practice

Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Jenny Pope, Alan Bond, A. John Sinclair et al.
1 citations
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
article

Needs and pathways for strengthening the contribution of qualitative methods toward more effective impact assessment practice

Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Jenny Pope, Alan Bond, A. John Sinclair, François Retief, Alan P. Diduck, Heidi Walker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many jurisdictions are looking to next-generation impact assessment (IA) that includes sustainability considerations that extend beyond biophysical. Subjectivity is inherent in many of these additional impact considerations, and they are often not easily nor effectively quantified. Delivering effective IA within this broadening scope requires new, innovative, and rigorous applications of qualitative methods that enable meaningful inclusion of diverse knowledges, values, and information. While many qualitative methods are available for IA, there remains a significant opportunity to strengthen their contribution toward more effective IA practice. As such, we establish in this paper needs that must be addressed if qualitative methods are to meaningfully contribute to IA and pathways for acting on these needs. Relating findings from a survey, semi-structured interviews, and a world café, the paper specifically identifies six key needs for enhancing the effective use of qualitative methods in IA, and five pathways for addressing these needs that involve all IA actors. We conclude that there are deeply entrenched assumptions about qualitative methods and that shifting these views will be challenging and take time. Together, the identified needs and pathways provide a framework for action to improve the effectiveness of IA and should be considered in IA training and practice.

Impact Assessment and Project AppraisalVol. 43(3)
University of East Anglia (GB), Edith Cowan University (AU), North-West University (ZA), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Integral Consulting (United States) (US), University of Manitoba (CA), The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.