A comprehensive study of highly concentrated Lithium‑ion aqueous electrolytes: from structural characterizations to electrochemical properties

• Structure differences between LiTFSI and LiNO 3 at high concentration was proven. • A method to link the structure and properties of aqueous electrolytes was developed. • The link between electrolyte structure and electrochemical properties was outlined. • Self-diffusion measurement of LiNO 3 solutions’ species were done using 15 N NMR. • Diluted to saturated LiNO 3 and LiTFSI solutions were studied at room temperature. Due to their scarce and expensive components, lithium‑ion batteries raise safety and cost concerns. Aiming for less toxic and cheaper batteries, aqueous electrolytes have emerged as a good alternative. To overcome their narrow electrochemical stability window, highly concentrated electrolytes have shown promising properties in reducing water reactivity. However, the lithium salts most commonly used in these electrolytes contain fluorinated organic anions, which have greater environmental and cost impacts when used in large amounts. Some low‑cost and more environmentally‑friendly salts started to emerge in aqueous electrolytes for battery and supercapacitor applications. In the present work, a comparative study between a low‑cost and highly concentrated lithium nitrate (LiNO 3 ) based electrolyte and an electrolyte using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) salt as a reference was conducted. Electrochemical measurements reveal that LiNO 3 ‑based electrolytes have a higher ionic conductivity but a narrower electrochemical stability window than LiTFSI‑based ones. Infrared spectroscopy, small‑angle X‑ray scattering and wide‑angle X‑ray scattering characterisations, coupled with self‑diffusion and viscosity measurements, shed light on the lack of structure formation in LiNO 3 ‑based electrolytes compared to LiTFSI‑based ones which have well‑organised domains. It demonstrates that LiNO 3 used alone in an aqueous electrolyte does not disrupt the network of water molecules and, therefore, does not reduce their reactivity. This study also proposes a systematic approach to evaluate salts or electrolyte formulations for application in low-cost aqueous batteries. By combining various characterisation techniques, it provides a framework to determine whether a given composition meets the essential criteria for widening the electrochemical stability window of aqueous electrolytes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electrochimica Acta
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146680
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive study of highly concentrated Lithium‑ion aqueous electrolytes: from structural characterizations to electrochemical properties

Pierre Toudret, Jean‐Frédéric Martin, Ariane Bayle, Sébastien Martinet et al.
6 citations
Electrochimica Acta
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
4.38
article

A comprehensive study of highly concentrated Lithium‑ion aqueous electrolytes: from structural characterizations to electrochemical properties

Pierre Toudret, Jean‐Frédéric Martin, Ariane Bayle, Sébastien Martinet, L. Flores
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Structure differences between LiTFSI and LiNO 3 at high concentration was proven. • A method to link the structure and properties of aqueous electrolytes was developed. • The link between electrolyte structure and electrochemical properties was outlined. • Self-diffusion measurement of LiNO 3 solutions’ species were done using 15 N NMR. • Diluted to saturated LiNO 3 and LiTFSI solutions were studied at room temperature. Due to their scarce and expensive components, lithium‑ion batteries raise safety and cost concerns. Aiming for less toxic and cheaper batteries, aqueous electrolytes have emerged as a good alternative. To overcome their narrow electrochemical stability window, highly concentrated electrolytes have shown promising properties in reducing water reactivity. However, the lithium salts most commonly used in these electrolytes contain fluorinated organic anions, which have greater environmental and cost impacts when used in large amounts. Some low‑cost and more environmentally‑friendly salts started to emerge in aqueous electrolytes for battery and supercapacitor applications. In the present work, a comparative study between a low‑cost and highly concentrated lithium nitrate (LiNO 3 ) based electrolyte and an electrolyte using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) salt as a reference was conducted. Electrochemical measurements reveal that LiNO 3 ‑based electrolytes have a higher ionic conductivity but a narrower electrochemical stability window than LiTFSI‑based ones. Infrared spectroscopy, small‑angle X‑ray scattering and wide‑angle X‑ray scattering characterisations, coupled with self‑diffusion and viscosity measurements, shed light on the lack of structure formation in LiNO 3 ‑based electrolytes compared to LiTFSI‑based ones which have well‑organised domains. It demonstrates that LiNO 3 used alone in an aqueous electrolyte does not disrupt the network of water molecules and, therefore, does not reduce their reactivity. This study also proposes a systematic approach to evaluate salts or electrolyte formulations for application in low-cost aqueous batteries. By combining various characterisation techniques, it provides a framework to determine whether a given composition meets the essential criteria for widening the electrochemical stability window of aqueous electrolytes.

Electrochimica ActaVol. 536
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, Agence de l'innovation de Défense
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.