Assessment for learning: Balancing traditional and innovative evaluation approaches in education

Assessment and evaluation play a crucial role in measuring student learning and instructional effectiveness. This document categorizes assessment into Formative and Summative Assessments and Authentic and Standardized Evaluation Methods. Formative assessments, such as quizzes, class discussions, and peer reviews, provide ongoing feedback to enhance learning, while summative assessments, including final exams and standardized tests, evaluate overall achievement. Authentic evaluation methods emphasize real-world applications, competency-based tasks, and technology-enhanced assessments, ensuring students develop practical skills. The integration of criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments allows for both individualized and comparative evaluations. By employing rubrics, self-assessments, and validated instruments, educators can ensure reliable and fair evaluation processes. These methods support continuous improvement in both teaching and learning by aligning assessments with curriculum goals. A balanced approach to assessment fosters deeper understanding, critical thinking, and skill mastery, preparing students for academic and professional success.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0402147
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment for learning: Balancing traditional and innovative evaluation approaches in education

Regina Galigao, April Mae Gabutero, Himeji-Ken Dela Peña
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Assessment for learning: Balancing traditional and innovative evaluation approaches in education

Regina Galigao, April Mae Gabutero, Himeji-Ken Dela Peña
article en

Abstract

Assessment and evaluation play a crucial role in measuring student learning and instructional effectiveness. This document categorizes assessment into Formative and Summative Assessments and Authentic and Standardized Evaluation Methods. Formative assessments, such as quizzes, class discussions, and peer reviews, provide ongoing feedback to enhance learning, while summative assessments, including final exams and standardized tests, evaluate overall achievement. Authentic evaluation methods emphasize real-world applications, competency-based tasks, and technology-enhanced assessments, ensuring students develop practical skills. The integration of criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments allows for both individualized and comparative evaluations. By employing rubrics, self-assessments, and validated instruments, educators can ensure reliable and fair evaluation processes. These methods support continuous improvement in both teaching and learning by aligning assessments with curriculum goals. A balanced approach to assessment fosters deeper understanding, critical thinking, and skill mastery, preparing students for academic and professional success.

Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.