An experimental study of decentralized matching

We present an experimental study of decentralized two‐sided matching markets with no transfers. Experimental participants are informed of everyone's preferences and can make arbitrary nonbinding match offers that get finalized when a period of market inactivity has elapsed. Several insights emerge. First, stable outcomes are prevalent. Second, while centralized clearinghouses commonly aim at implementing extremal stable matchings, our decentralized markets most frequently culminate in the median stable matching. Third, preferences' cardinal representations impact the stable partners with whom participants match. Last, the dynamics underlying our results exhibit strategic sophistication, with agents successfully avoiding cycles of blocking pairs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantitative Economics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3982/qe2316
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An experimental study of decentralized matching

Leeat Yariv, Alejandro Robinson-Cortés, Federico Echenique
3 citations
Quantitative Economics
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
article

An experimental study of decentralized matching

Leeat Yariv, Alejandro Robinson-Cortés, Federico Echenique
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We present an experimental study of decentralized two‐sided matching markets with no transfers. Experimental participants are informed of everyone's preferences and can make arbitrary nonbinding match offers that get finalized when a period of market inactivity has elapsed. Several insights emerge. First, stable outcomes are prevalent. Second, while centralized clearinghouses commonly aim at implementing extremal stable matchings, our decentralized markets most frequently culminate in the median stable matching. Third, preferences' cardinal representations impact the stable partners with whom participants match. Last, the dynamics underlying our results exhibit strategic sophistication, with agents successfully avoiding cycles of blocking pairs.

Quantitative EconomicsVol. 16(2)
Princeton University (US), University of Exeter (GB), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An experimental study of decentralized matching — Leeat Yariv, Alejandro Robinson-Cortés, et al. · Quantitative Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS