Comparison of Supine and Prone Positions in PCNL Operations Performed in Isolated Kidney Upper Pole Access

Background: Renal stones larger than 2 cm in the upper pelvical system are usually managed with Percutaneous Nephro-lithotomy (PCNL) operation, but there are unclear as to which position should be used. In our study, we aimed to compare the preoperative-peroperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent PCNL with isolated renal upper pole access in supine and prone position. Materials and Methods: The study included 20 Supine PCNL and 45 Prone PCNL cases who underwent isolated renal upper pole access for renal calculi. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) were evaluated from demographic data. Radiological findings such as stone-skin distance, stone density, stone size and volume were recorded. Total operation time, access time and fluoroscopy time were recorded from peroperative data. In the postoperative period, the duration of hospital stay and complications according to Clavien Dindo classification were recorded. Non-contrast computed tomography was performed at the 1st postoperative month and the stone-free status of the patients was evaluated. Results: There was no statistical difference in demographic data in terms of age, gender, BMI, ASA scores in both groups. The total operation time was 75.95±28.7 min in supine PCNL group and 92.48±23.4 min in prone PCNL group (p<0.001). Access time was 11.6±5.12 min in supine PCNL group and 9.2±3.7 min in prone PCNL group (p<0.001). Fluoroscopy time was 3.6±1.2 min in the supine PCNL group and 2.5±1.1 min in the prone PCNL group and was statistically longer (p<0.001). There was no difference in complications between the groups. Grade>2 complications according to Clavien Dindo classification were more frequent in supine PCNL patients (p:0.03). Stone-free status was 70% in supine PCNL patients and 77.7% in prone PCNL patients and was higher in the prone PCNL group (p:0.01). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCNL for isolated upper pol stone, the operation time is longer when prone PCNL is performed, but higher stone-free rates are obtained in these patients. Grade >2 complications are less common in prone PCNL for renal upper pole calculi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1637397
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Supine and Prone Positions in PCNL Operations Performed in Isolated Kidney Upper Pole Access

Ömer Koraş, Ferhat Demirci, Yusuf Arıkan, Büşra Emir et al.
1 links
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Comparison of Supine and Prone Positions in PCNL Operations Performed in Isolated Kidney Upper Pole Access

Ömer Koraş, Ferhat Demirci, Yusuf Arıkan, Büşra Emir, Mehmet Zeynel Keskin, Yavuz Onur Danacıoğlu, Serhat Beyan, Mert Güroğlu
article en

Abstract

Background: Renal stones larger than 2 cm in the upper pelvical system are usually managed with Percutaneous Nephro-lithotomy (PCNL) operation, but there are unclear as to which position should be used. In our study, we aimed to compare the preoperative-peroperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent PCNL with isolated renal upper pole access in supine and prone position. Materials and Methods: The study included 20 Supine PCNL and 45 Prone PCNL cases who underwent isolated renal upper pole access for renal calculi. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) were evaluated from demographic data. Radiological findings such as stone-skin distance, stone density, stone size and volume were recorded. Total operation time, access time and fluoroscopy time were recorded from peroperative data. In the postoperative period, the duration of hospital stay and complications according to Clavien Dindo classification were recorded. Non-contrast computed tomography was performed at the 1st postoperative month and the stone-free status of the patients was evaluated. Results: There was no statistical difference in demographic data in terms of age, gender, BMI, ASA scores in both groups. The total operation time was 75.95±28.7 min in supine PCNL group and 92.48±23.4 min in prone PCNL group (p<0.001). Access time was 11.6±5.12 min in supine PCNL group and 9.2±3.7 min in prone PCNL group (p<0.001). Fluoroscopy time was 3.6±1.2 min in the supine PCNL group and 2.5±1.1 min in the prone PCNL group and was statistically longer (p<0.001). There was no difference in complications between the groups. Grade>2 complications according to Clavien Dindo classification were more frequent in supine PCNL patients (p:0.03). Stone-free status was 70% in supine PCNL patients and 77.7% in prone PCNL patients and was higher in the prone PCNL group (p:0.01). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCNL for isolated upper pol stone, the operation time is longer when prone PCNL is performed, but higher stone-free rates are obtained in these patients. Grade >2 complications are less common in prone PCNL for renal upper pole calculi.

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi DergisiVol. 22(2)
Izmir University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR), Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), University of Health Sciences (SO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.