Complementary descriptions of three nominal phytoseiid mite species (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) invalid under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature

This study reevaluates three phytoseiid mite species: Proprioseiopsis doorco, Indiraseiulus pectoralus, and Paraseiulus parajirofticus, described by Denmark & Evans in 2011. Upon review, we found that the original descriptions of these species did not comply with Article 16.4.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The species were described after 1999 and a statement was not included indicating the repository for the type specimens. Moreover, our examination of the type specimens revealed that if the names of these species had been made available, they would have been junior synonyms of previously described species: Proprioseiopsis mauiensis (Prasad), Ricoseius loxocheles (De Leon) and Paraseiulus soleiger (Ribaga), respectively. Given that, rather than naming a repository to make those names available, we propose keeping them deliberately as nomina nuda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic and Applied Acarology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.30.6.4
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complementary descriptions of three nominal phytoseiid mite species (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) invalid under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature

İsmail Döker, Samuel J. Bolton, Isabelle Atchia
Systematic and Applied Acarology
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Complementary descriptions of three nominal phytoseiid mite species (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) invalid under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature

İsmail Döker, Samuel J. Bolton, Isabelle Atchia
article en

Abstract

This study reevaluates three phytoseiid mite species: Proprioseiopsis doorco, Indiraseiulus pectoralus, and Paraseiulus parajirofticus, described by Denmark & Evans in 2011. Upon review, we found that the original descriptions of these species did not comply with Article 16.4.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The species were described after 1999 and a statement was not included indicating the repository for the type specimens. Moreover, our examination of the type specimens revealed that if the names of these species had been made available, they would have been junior synonyms of previously described species: Proprioseiopsis mauiensis (Prasad), Ricoseius loxocheles (De Leon) and Paraseiulus soleiger (Ribaga), respectively. Given that, rather than naming a repository to make those names available, we propose keeping them deliberately as nomina nuda.

Systematic and Applied Acarology
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (US), Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complementary descriptions of three nominal phytoseiid mite species (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) invalid under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature — İsmail Döker, Samuel J. Bolton, et al. · Systematic and Applied Acarology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS