Competitive Position, Expectations, and Managerial Approaches to Risk in National Football League Football

This paper analyzes how National Football League coaches incorporate information on competitive position and expectations of winning into fourth down decisions. Theoretically, teams should take more risk when their win probability is relatively low since additional risk broadens the distribution of possible outcomes thereby increasing the likelihood of victory. Our findings confirm this. We find that heavier favorites and teams having had higher levels of win probability within the game attempt more fourth down conversions, both on plays where attempting a play is estimated to be optimal and on plays where it is not. One possible explanation for this is coaches in those positions more likely frame their current win probability as being below a previously defined reference point, which reduces their degree of loss aversion. On balance, we find that this increased aggressiveness on fourth down improves the expected changes in win probability in this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sport Management
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2024-0254
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competitive Position, Expectations, and Managerial Approaches to Risk in National Football League Football

Mark F. Owens, Michael A. Roach
1 citations
Journal of Sport Management
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
article

Competitive Position, Expectations, and Managerial Approaches to Risk in National Football League Football

Mark F. Owens, Michael A. Roach
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes how National Football League coaches incorporate information on competitive position and expectations of winning into fourth down decisions. Theoretically, teams should take more risk when their win probability is relatively low since additional risk broadens the distribution of possible outcomes thereby increasing the likelihood of victory. Our findings confirm this. We find that heavier favorites and teams having had higher levels of win probability within the game attempt more fourth down conversions, both on plays where attempting a play is estimated to be optimal and on plays where it is not. One possible explanation for this is coaches in those positions more likely frame their current win probability as being below a previously defined reference point, which reduces their degree of loss aversion. On balance, we find that this increased aggressiveness on fourth down improves the expected changes in win probability in this context.

Journal of Sport ManagementVol. 39(5)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Middle Tennessee State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.