Small Delay Fault Testing with Multiple Voltages under Variations: Defect vs. Fault Coverage

Abstract It has been known and explored for many years that low voltage testing amplifies the effect of a defect, increasing the size of a Small Delay Fault (SDF) and, in the best case, turning SDFs into easily detectable stuck-at-faults. It is often overlooked that $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> testing poses an additional challenge to the test pattern generation method under process variations. The standard deviation of gate delays under $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is a multiple of that under nominal voltage. The increased variation will invalidate the efficiency of test patterns generated under nominal voltage and significantly reduce fault coverage. This paper presents the first algorithm for test pattern generation specifically tuned for $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> testing which obtains higher fault coverage by smaller test sets than those generated for nominal voltage. The patterns applicable to other voltage levels can be derived from the pattern set generated under extreme variations at low supply voltage. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method produces test patterns that outperform N-detection test sets in terms of test set volume and fault efficiency across different voltage levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electronic Testing
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-025-06172-8
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small Delay Fault Testing with Multiple Voltages under Variations: Defect vs. Fault Coverage

Hanieh Jafarzadeh, Hans-Joachim Wunderlich, Sybille Hellebrand, Hussam Amrouch et al.
Journal of Electronic Testing
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
article

Small Delay Fault Testing with Multiple Voltages under Variations: Defect vs. Fault Coverage

Hanieh Jafarzadeh, Hans-Joachim Wunderlich, Sybille Hellebrand, Hussam Amrouch, Florian Klemme
article en

Abstract

Abstract It has been known and explored for many years that low voltage testing amplifies the effect of a defect, increasing the size of a Small Delay Fault (SDF) and, in the best case, turning SDFs into easily detectable stuck-at-faults. It is often overlooked that $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> testing poses an additional challenge to the test pattern generation method under process variations. The standard deviation of gate delays under $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is a multiple of that under nominal voltage. The increased variation will invalidate the efficiency of test patterns generated under nominal voltage and significantly reduce fault coverage. This paper presents the first algorithm for test pattern generation specifically tuned for $$V_{\textrm{min}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> testing which obtains higher fault coverage by smaller test sets than those generated for nominal voltage. The patterns applicable to other voltage levels can be derived from the pattern set generated under extreme variations at low supply voltage. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method produces test patterns that outperform N-detection test sets in terms of test set volume and fault efficiency across different voltage levels.

Journal of Electronic TestingVol. 41(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Siemens (Germany) (DE), Paderborn University (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Stuttgart
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.