An analytical framework for humanitarian protocol and policy review exercises

This paper presents the main lines of an analytical framework to approach humanitarian policy review exercises, based on the example of the IASC System-Wide Scale-Up Protocols. Anchored in sociological paradigms, this framework could be understood as a socio-phenomenological-functionalist one. It revolves around two central steps: i) starting from practice in order to grasp the reality of a protocol or policy, and ii) considering a protocol or policy (as revealed through its practice) as a sui-generis social object whose patterns of realisation are to be identified. The idea is to make this framework available so that it can be used (when and where relevant) for other similar review exercises. Although it doesn’t aim to evaluate the quality and relevancy of a protocol or policy in light of a broader environment, this approach appears pertinent to reconstruct a protocol or policy as it manifests in practice, which enables actors to maximise its use and deploy it more efficiently.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Humanitarian Leader
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2025art2172
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analytical framework for humanitarian protocol and policy review exercises

Raphael Gorgeu
The Humanitarian Leader
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

An analytical framework for humanitarian protocol and policy review exercises

Raphael Gorgeu
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the main lines of an analytical framework to approach humanitarian policy review exercises, based on the example of the IASC System-Wide Scale-Up Protocols. Anchored in sociological paradigms, this framework could be understood as a socio-phenomenological-functionalist one. It revolves around two central steps: i) starting from practice in order to grasp the reality of a protocol or policy, and ii) considering a protocol or policy (as revealed through its practice) as a sui-generis social object whose patterns of realisation are to be identified. The idea is to make this framework available so that it can be used (when and where relevant) for other similar review exercises. Although it doesn’t aim to evaluate the quality and relevancy of a protocol or policy in light of a broader environment, this approach appears pertinent to reconstruct a protocol or policy as it manifests in practice, which enables actors to maximise its use and deploy it more efficiently.

The Humanitarian LeaderVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.